Counterfactual Reasoning and Cognitive Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis

This bibliometric analysis follows the PRISMA criteria to systematically find and combine existing literature that connects counterfactual thinking to cognitive science. The Scopus database identified 1253 articles, out of which 256 were pertinent. The analysis demonstrates a substantial increase in academic publications in cognitive science related to counterfactual thinking since 1990, suggesting a heightened scholarly commitment and interest in this interdisciplinary field. The study emphasizes the global significance and impact of research endeavors investigating this subject. In addition, the growing corpus of literature recognizes counterfactual thinking as a critical component of cognitive processes. The review calls for more research into and inclusion of counterfactual thinking in cognitive science studies. It stresses the need for collaborations between different fields and new ways of doing things in order to fully understand the complex connection between cognitive processes and counterfactual thinking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v14-i8/22373
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counterfactual Reasoning and Cognitive Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis

AbdalRahman Mohammad Teama, Ayda Alharrasi
International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Counterfactual Reasoning and Cognitive Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis

AbdalRahman Mohammad Teama, Ayda Alharrasi
article en

Abstract

This bibliometric analysis follows the PRISMA criteria to systematically find and combine existing literature that connects counterfactual thinking to cognitive science. The Scopus database identified 1253 articles, out of which 256 were pertinent. The analysis demonstrates a substantial increase in academic publications in cognitive science related to counterfactual thinking since 1990, suggesting a heightened scholarly commitment and interest in this interdisciplinary field. The study emphasizes the global significance and impact of research endeavors investigating this subject. In addition, the growing corpus of literature recognizes counterfactual thinking as a critical component of cognitive processes. The review calls for more research into and inclusion of counterfactual thinking in cognitive science studies. It stresses the need for collaborations between different fields and new ways of doing things in order to fully understand the complex connection between cognitive processes and counterfactual thinking.

International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social SciencesVol. 14(8)
Cairo University (EG), Sultan Qaboos University (OM)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Counterfactual Reasoning and Cognitive Sciences: A Bibliometric Analysis — AbdalRahman Mohammad Teama, Ayda Alharrasi · International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS