Comparative Analysis of Hemodynamic Responses and Oropharyngeal Complications in Tracheal Intubation: Evaluating Conventional, Video, and Rigid Video Laryngoscopes Under General Anesthesia

BACKGROUND This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic changes and the occurrence of oropharyngeal complications among patients undergoing tracheal intubation with an ordinary laryngoscope, video laryngoscope, and rigid video laryngoscope under general anesthesia. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients undergoing elective tracheal intubation under general anesthesia were prospectively enrolled as study subjects. Hemodynamic indicators such as diastolic blood pressure (DBP), systolic blood pressure (SBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR), as well as the incidences of oropharyngeal complications, including dental injury, oral mucosal injury, hoarseness, sore throat, and dysphagia, were observed in the patients of 3 groups (group A: ordinary laryngoscope, group B: video laryngoscope, group C: rigid video laryngoscope). Observations were made after anesthesia induction (T₀), immediately after tracheal intubation (T₁), and at 5 min after intubation (T₂). RESULTS The HR at T1 in group A was significantly higher than in groups B and C (P<0.05). However, the difference in the number of tracheal intubations was statistically significant among the 3 groups (P<0.05); group C exhibited the highest first-time success rate of tracheal intubation (95%), whereas group A had the highest failure rate (5%). Significant differences were also noted in the incidences of oral mucosal injury and sore throat among the groups (P<0.05), with the highest incidence in group A and the lowest in group C. CONCLUSIONS Compared with the ordinary laryngoscope, tracheal intubation using a video or rigid video laryngoscope results in milder hemodynamic impacts and fewer intubation-related complications. The rigid video laryngoscope may be safer and more effective.