A new unified measure for evaluation of randomized response techniques

Randomized response scrambling techniques have been in existence for over fifty years. These scrambling methods are very useful in sample surveys where researchers deal with sensitive variables. Out of many available scrambling techniques, survey researchers often need to evaluate these techniques to choose the best technique for real-world surveys. In the current literature, only a limited number of model-evaluation metrics are available for analyzing the performance of different scrambling methods. This leaves a big research gap for the development of new unified evaluation measures which can quantify all aspects of a scrambling technique. We develop a novel unified metric for evaluation of randomized response models and compare it with the existing unified measure. The proposed measure can quantify the efficiency and the level of the respondents' privacy of any scrambling technique. Being less sensitive to sample sizes than the existing unified measure, the proposed measure can be used with small sample sizes to evaluate models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Heliyon
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35852
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A new unified measure for evaluation of randomized response techniques

Olayan Albalawi, Sundus Hussain, Muhammad Waqar Azeem, Abdul Salam
2 citations
Heliyon
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
1.42
article

A new unified measure for evaluation of randomized response techniques

Olayan Albalawi, Sundus Hussain, Muhammad Waqar Azeem, Abdul Salam
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Randomized response scrambling techniques have been in existence for over fifty years. These scrambling methods are very useful in sample surveys where researchers deal with sensitive variables. Out of many available scrambling techniques, survey researchers often need to evaluate these techniques to choose the best technique for real-world surveys. In the current literature, only a limited number of model-evaluation metrics are available for analyzing the performance of different scrambling methods. This leaves a big research gap for the development of new unified evaluation measures which can quantify all aspects of a scrambling technique. We develop a novel unified metric for evaluation of randomized response models and compare it with the existing unified measure. The proposed measure can quantify the efficiency and the level of the respondents' privacy of any scrambling technique. Being less sensitive to sample sizes than the existing unified measure, the proposed measure can be used with small sample sizes to evaluate models.

HeliyonVol. 10(16)
Shaheed Benazir Bhutto Women University Peshawar (PK), University of Malakand (PK), University of Tabuk (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A new unified measure for evaluation of randomized response techniques — Olayan Albalawi, Sundus Hussain, et al. · Heliyon (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS