An Update to the Stochastically Perturbed Parameterization Scheme of HarmonEPS

Abstract High-resolution, limited-area forecasting is strongly affected by errors in the initial atmospheric state, lateral boundary conditions (LBCs), and physical parameterizations used by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. These errors need to be accounted for through the introduction of uncertainty in an ensemble prediction system (EPS). One approach to account for model error is to use a stochastically perturbed parameterizations (SPPs) scheme. A first version of the SPP scheme of HARMONIE EPS (HarmonEPS) has been tested, with promising improvements in ensemble spread. However, it introduced systematic biases and deteriorated skill scores for some variables. Here, we investigate the performance of an updated version of the HarmonEPS SPP scheme, which includes (i) the use of uniform distributions, (ii) the correlation of stochastic patterns between key SPP parameters, and (iii) the introduction of four additional parameters, in the microphysics and mass-flux schemes. Two five-parameter SPP-based setups are compared against initial and LBC perturbations setups for five forecast periods: (i) 22–28 March 2019, (ii) 6–12 July 2020, (iii) 20–26 February 2021, (iv) 13–26 January 2021, and (v) 20 May–2 June 2021. We find that SPP-based experiments show better probabilistic metrics for near-surface and cloud-related variables than the non-SPP experiments. The SPP-based ensembles show increased spatial spread (as indicated by dFSS), while maintaining similar spatial skill (as indicated by eFSS) with the non-SPP experiment. In addition, the systematic bias in the ensemble members of the previous SPP iteration has been alleviated with the use of uniform distributions. Finally, the use of microphysical and mass-flux perturbations improves the ensemble scores for cloud-related variables, precipitation, and visibility. Significance Statement Ensemble prediction systems are essential for weather forecasting. Their skill depends on the representation of uncertainties arising from errors in the initial atmospheric state and model physics. In this study, we present an update to the stochastically perturbed parameterizations scheme, which represents uncertainty arising from model errors, of the limited-area HARMONIE ensemble prediction system. The update to the scheme includes the introduction of uniform distributions and correlated perturbations for the perturbed parameters, as well as the addition of four new perturbed parameters. Overall, this revision removes systematic biases in ensemble members, which were present in the previous iteration of the scheme, and shows increased ensemble spread (up to 70%) and reduced model errors (up to 5%) for near-surface and cloud-related variables.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Monthly Weather Review
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1175/mwr-d-23-0212.1
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.75

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Update to the Stochastically Perturbed Parameterization Scheme of HarmonEPS

Jan Barkmeijer, Wim C. de Rooy, Sibbo van der Veen, Ulf Andrae et al.
2 citations
Monthly Weather Review
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
0.75
article

An Update to the Stochastically Perturbed Parameterization Scheme of HarmonEPS

Jan Barkmeijer, Wim C. de Rooy, Sibbo van der Veen, Ulf Andrae, Inger‐Lise Frogner, Sebastián Contreras Osorio, Alan Hally, Aristofanis Tsiringakis
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract High-resolution, limited-area forecasting is strongly affected by errors in the initial atmospheric state, lateral boundary conditions (LBCs), and physical parameterizations used by numerical weather prediction (NWP) models. These errors need to be accounted for through the introduction of uncertainty in an ensemble prediction system (EPS). One approach to account for model error is to use a stochastically perturbed parameterizations (SPPs) scheme. A first version of the SPP scheme of HARMONIE EPS (HarmonEPS) has been tested, with promising improvements in ensemble spread. However, it introduced systematic biases and deteriorated skill scores for some variables. Here, we investigate the performance of an updated version of the HarmonEPS SPP scheme, which includes (i) the use of uniform distributions, (ii) the correlation of stochastic patterns between key SPP parameters, and (iii) the introduction of four additional parameters, in the microphysics and mass-flux schemes. Two five-parameter SPP-based setups are compared against initial and LBC perturbations setups for five forecast periods: (i) 22–28 March 2019, (ii) 6–12 July 2020, (iii) 20–26 February 2021, (iv) 13–26 January 2021, and (v) 20 May–2 June 2021. We find that SPP-based experiments show better probabilistic metrics for near-surface and cloud-related variables than the non-SPP experiments. The SPP-based ensembles show increased spatial spread (as indicated by dFSS), while maintaining similar spatial skill (as indicated by eFSS) with the non-SPP experiment. In addition, the systematic bias in the ensemble members of the previous SPP iteration has been alleviated with the use of uniform distributions. Finally, the use of microphysical and mass-flux perturbations improves the ensemble scores for cloud-related variables, precipitation, and visibility. Significance Statement Ensemble prediction systems are essential for weather forecasting. Their skill depends on the representation of uncertainties arising from errors in the initial atmospheric state and model physics. In this study, we present an update to the stochastically perturbed parameterizations scheme, which represents uncertainty arising from model errors, of the limited-area HARMONIE ensemble prediction system. The update to the scheme includes the introduction of uniform distributions and correlated perturbations for the perturbed parameters, as well as the addition of four new perturbed parameters. Overall, this revision removes systematic biases in ensemble members, which were present in the previous iteration of the scheme, and shows increased ensemble spread (up to 70%) and reduced model errors (up to 5%) for near-surface and cloud-related variables.

Monthly Weather ReviewVol. 152(8)
Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (SE), Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (NL), Norwegian Meteorological Institute (NO), Met Éireann (IE)
Koninklijk Nederlands Meteorologisch Instituut
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
0.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.