2308 A pilot project implementing a dysphagia screening tool for femoral fracture patients.

Abstract Background Evidence suggests 30–40% of patients with a neck of femur fracture (NOF#) develop oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) during the perioperative period. 1–2 Our data, collected over two months, shows our Speech and Language Therapy Team (SLT) identified only 12% of cases. Given the importance of nutrition and medication in the perioperative period, early identification of OPD is critical. We launched a new dysphagia screening tool for all patients admitted to our hospital with a NOF#. Methods A retrospective review of patient notes allowed collection of data regarding age, hip injury, frailty score, comorbidities, and staff compliance with tool. Patients with a completed screening tool had outcomes recorded (low, medium, high risk), timeliness of referral to SLT if appropriate, and if OPD was present on assessment. Balancing measures included length of time kept nil by mouth. We completed four PDSA cycles over 5 months. Results During this period, 157 patients were admitted with a NOF# and 58 had a completed screening tool. By producing a training pack and expanding into the emergency department, compliance improved by 33% over the 4 cycles. 19 of the 58 patients with a completed screening tool had OPD; 79% had mild, 14% moderate and 7% severe. The screen was adjusted during each cycle improving the suitability of SLT referrals from a 25% identification rate in cycle 1 to 100% in cycle 4. No patients were kept nil by mouth. Conclusions The screening tool has increased OPD identification by 21%. However, this requires staff training and high compliance rates to be effective. Next steps include adding the tool to the NOF# proforma, creating a training pack for the wider MDT, and improving the specificity of the tool. References 1. Love et al. Age and Ageing, 2013. 42(6):782–5. 2. Mateos-Nozal J et al. Age and Ageing, 2021. 28;50(4):1416–1421.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae139.012
Primary Topic
Hip and Femur Fractures
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2308 A pilot project implementing a dysphagia screening tool for femoral fracture patients.

R. Bradley, D. Paxton, M. R. Buist
Age and Ageing
Hip and Femur Fractures
article

2308 A pilot project implementing a dysphagia screening tool for femoral fracture patients.

R. Bradley, D. Paxton, M. R. Buist
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Evidence suggests 30–40% of patients with a neck of femur fracture (NOF#) develop oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) during the perioperative period. 1–2 Our data, collected over two months, shows our Speech and Language Therapy Team (SLT) identified only 12% of cases. Given the importance of nutrition and medication in the perioperative period, early identification of OPD is critical. We launched a new dysphagia screening tool for all patients admitted to our hospital with a NOF#. Methods A retrospective review of patient notes allowed collection of data regarding age, hip injury, frailty score, comorbidities, and staff compliance with tool. Patients with a completed screening tool had outcomes recorded (low, medium, high risk), timeliness of referral to SLT if appropriate, and if OPD was present on assessment. Balancing measures included length of time kept nil by mouth. We completed four PDSA cycles over 5 months. Results During this period, 157 patients were admitted with a NOF# and 58 had a completed screening tool. By producing a training pack and expanding into the emergency department, compliance improved by 33% over the 4 cycles. 19 of the 58 patients with a completed screening tool had OPD; 79% had mild, 14% moderate and 7% severe. The screen was adjusted during each cycle improving the suitability of SLT referrals from a 25% identification rate in cycle 1 to 100% in cycle 4. No patients were kept nil by mouth. Conclusions The screening tool has increased OPD identification by 21%. However, this requires staff training and high compliance rates to be effective. Next steps include adding the tool to the NOF# proforma, creating a training pack for the wider MDT, and improving the specificity of the tool. References 1. Love et al. Age and Ageing, 2013. 42(6):782–5. 2. Mateos-Nozal J et al. Age and Ageing, 2021. 28;50(4):1416–1421.

Age and AgeingVol. 53(Supplement_3)
University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Bristol Royal Infirmary (GB), University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Hip and Femur Fractures
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.