2242 Retrospective study of inpatient falls resulting in patient harm April–September 2023. Comparing our care to the BSG guidelines.

Abstract Objective To identify good practices and highlight areas for improvement in the prevention and management of inpatient falls. Method Fifteen patients had serious inpatient falls between April and September 2023 within the hospital. Electronic notes and fall panel meeting minutes were used to provide an analysis of the ‘pre-fall’ and ‘post-fall’ assessments. Data was collected and analysed using AMaT and then compared to the standards set by RCP National Audit of Inpatient Falls (NAIF)—from KPI overview, 25% of patients had good quality Multi Factorial Risk Assessment (MFRA) in our Trust compared to National average of 33%. Results 70% of patients had been identified as high risk of falls at admission. Patients were prescribed a median of 10 medications, with a median of 3 falls-risk increasing drugs (FRID). Before the inpatient fall: the majority of patients received an ECG and mobility assessment early in admission. Only 40% of patients had a lying/standing blood pressure (LSBP) 100% of those that showed a deficit were acted on appropriately. Only 20% had a documented medication review. Following the inpatient fall: A LSBP was done in only 33% of patients. A medication review was completed in 53% yet the average patient was discharged with 3 more medications. 73% of patients suffered fragility fractures due to the fall however bone protection was only considered in 40%. Conclusion This audit highlights that there are areas of MFRA that require improvement, specifically LSBP, and a medication review. 33% of falls occurred in ‘medically-optimised’ patients—resulting in at least 60 additional inpatient days. The results have been discussed with the multi-disciplinary team—intervention to improve performance will be piloted in two areas with the highest incidence of inpatient falls, with continuous learning and sharing of lessons embedded into our Falls Collaborative Initiative.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae139.009
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2242 Retrospective study of inpatient falls resulting in patient harm April–September 2023. Comparing our care to the BSG guidelines.

Ð Alićehajić-Bečić, M Quartano
Age and Ageing
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

2242 Retrospective study of inpatient falls resulting in patient harm April–September 2023. Comparing our care to the BSG guidelines.

Ð Alićehajić-Bečić, M Quartano
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective To identify good practices and highlight areas for improvement in the prevention and management of inpatient falls. Method Fifteen patients had serious inpatient falls between April and September 2023 within the hospital. Electronic notes and fall panel meeting minutes were used to provide an analysis of the ‘pre-fall’ and ‘post-fall’ assessments. Data was collected and analysed using AMaT and then compared to the standards set by RCP National Audit of Inpatient Falls (NAIF)—from KPI overview, 25% of patients had good quality Multi Factorial Risk Assessment (MFRA) in our Trust compared to National average of 33%. Results 70% of patients had been identified as high risk of falls at admission. Patients were prescribed a median of 10 medications, with a median of 3 falls-risk increasing drugs (FRID). Before the inpatient fall: the majority of patients received an ECG and mobility assessment early in admission. Only 40% of patients had a lying/standing blood pressure (LSBP) 100% of those that showed a deficit were acted on appropriately. Only 20% had a documented medication review. Following the inpatient fall: A LSBP was done in only 33% of patients. A medication review was completed in 53% yet the average patient was discharged with 3 more medications. 73% of patients suffered fragility fractures due to the fall however bone protection was only considered in 40%. Conclusion This audit highlights that there are areas of MFRA that require improvement, specifically LSBP, and a medication review. 33% of falls occurred in ‘medically-optimised’ patients—resulting in at least 60 additional inpatient days. The results have been discussed with the multi-disciplinary team—intervention to improve performance will be piloted in two areas with the highest incidence of inpatient falls, with continuous learning and sharing of lessons embedded into our Falls Collaborative Initiative.

Age and AgeingVol. 53(Supplement_3)
Royal Albert Edward Infirmary (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

2242 Retrospective study of inpatient falls resulting in patient harm April–September 2023. Comparing our care to the BSG guidelines. — Ð Alićehajić-Bečić, M Quartano · Age and Ageing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS