2278 Adding value to the patient experience through a clinically optimised pathway approach

Abstract Introduction High numbers of clinically optimised patients in a DGH were having daily clinical input. RAAC clinical incident resulted in movement of clinically optimised patients from the district general hospital to a community hospital increasing the community bedbase from 32 to 72. This gave the opportunity to review how these patients were managed. Method In the first PDSA cycle, it was recognised that daily medical ward rounds for clinically optimised patients were neither necessary nor optimal and potentially perpetuated the impression that patients required in hospital care. These observations were sought using process mapping and fish bone diagram. In the second cycle, all clinically optimised were planned to be seen once a week on ward round. All patients were discussed on the daily multidisciplinary board round and if needed were changed on the board to not clinically optimised which prompted review. Nurses could also ask for review outside of the board round. Results During a four-week period one third, (24/72) of patients needed review outside of the weekly planned review. Of these 79.2% required only one review. Consequentially junior doctors reported to save an estimated cumulative of 16–48 hrs per week. Balancing measures of falls, mortality, pressure sores and complaints showed no change in the four months after implementation of the change. Patient, family and staff qualitative feedback was gathered. The next two cycles involved polypharmacy review and offered clinically optimised patients a ‘What Matters to Me’; meeting with their family utilising the time saved to improve communication, medication review and future care planning. Conclusion Data suggested no adverse impact of change in practice. Staff were redeployed to the front door frailty team rather than community hospital to improve access to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and a new pathway was designed to create uniformity in flow for admissions to frailty.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae139.034
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2278 Adding value to the patient experience through a clinically optimised pathway approach

Sougata Poddar, Bruce Bowen, Laura K. Rogers, D Gunarathna et al.
Age and Ageing
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

2278 Adding value to the patient experience through a clinically optimised pathway approach

Sougata Poddar, Bruce Bowen, Laura K. Rogers, D Gunarathna, A Puffet, Z Griiffiths, Thomas Phillips
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction High numbers of clinically optimised patients in a DGH were having daily clinical input. RAAC clinical incident resulted in movement of clinically optimised patients from the district general hospital to a community hospital increasing the community bedbase from 32 to 72. This gave the opportunity to review how these patients were managed. Method In the first PDSA cycle, it was recognised that daily medical ward rounds for clinically optimised patients were neither necessary nor optimal and potentially perpetuated the impression that patients required in hospital care. These observations were sought using process mapping and fish bone diagram. In the second cycle, all clinically optimised were planned to be seen once a week on ward round. All patients were discussed on the daily multidisciplinary board round and if needed were changed on the board to not clinically optimised which prompted review. Nurses could also ask for review outside of the board round. Results During a four-week period one third, (24/72) of patients needed review outside of the weekly planned review. Of these 79.2% required only one review. Consequentially junior doctors reported to save an estimated cumulative of 16–48 hrs per week. Balancing measures of falls, mortality, pressure sores and complaints showed no change in the four months after implementation of the change. Patient, family and staff qualitative feedback was gathered. The next two cycles involved polypharmacy review and offered clinically optimised patients a ‘What Matters to Me’; meeting with their family utilising the time saved to improve communication, medication review and future care planning. Conclusion Data suggested no adverse impact of change in practice. Staff were redeployed to the front door frailty team rather than community hospital to improve access to Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment, and a new pathway was designed to create uniformity in flow for admissions to frailty.

Age and AgeingVol. 53(Supplement_3)
Hywel Dda University Health Board (GB)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.