2259 Assessing antibiotic usage on a geriatric ward

Abstract Introduction The World Health Organisation lists antibiotic resistance as one of the biggest threats to global health [1]. We contribute to this as clinicians, through errors such as delayed review of prescriptions or prescribing against local trust guidelines. Method We have carried out a quality improvement project to improve antibiotic prescriptions on a geriatric ward at Croydon University Hospital. We carried out a fortnightly cross-sectional analysis of the antibiotic prescriptions on a geriatric ward. This included looking at the antibiotic prescribed, indication, duration, route of administration and presence of a review date. These were then compared to trust guidelines. After the first 8-weeks, we delivered a departmental teaching session on antibiotic prescriptions. We then re-audited the prescriptions. Following this, we sent out weekly email reminders on locating trust guidelines and information on prescriptions. We then re-audited following this. Finally, we created an e-learning resource to deliver to the ward on antibiotic prescriptions. We are planning to deliver this to the ward and re-audit afterwards. Results Initially, up to 90.0% of prescriptions differed from trust guidelines. Common reasons for differences when compared included incorrect drug prescribed, incorrect frequency of dosing, or non-specific indications leading to difficulty comparing. Following all interventions, approximately 32% of prescriptions differed from trust guidelines. This showed sustained improvement across 2 complete PDSA cycles (plan, do, study, act). A 3rd PDSA cycle is ongoing at present and preliminary data has shown approximately 28% of prescriptions differed from trust guidelines. Conclusion This quality improvement project has successfully contributed to a reduction in prescription errors and safe prescribing. We will continue to provide information to our colleagues on antibiotic stewardship, to further encourage safe prescribing. [1]. Antibiotic resistance (2020) World Health Organisation. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance (Accessed: May 2023).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae139.044
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2259 Assessing antibiotic usage on a geriatric ward

Matt Truman, R Rawoo, Idowu Ajibola, Wee Yong Tan
Age and Ageing
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

2259 Assessing antibiotic usage on a geriatric ward

Matt Truman, R Rawoo, Idowu Ajibola, Wee Yong Tan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The World Health Organisation lists antibiotic resistance as one of the biggest threats to global health [1]. We contribute to this as clinicians, through errors such as delayed review of prescriptions or prescribing against local trust guidelines. Method We have carried out a quality improvement project to improve antibiotic prescriptions on a geriatric ward at Croydon University Hospital. We carried out a fortnightly cross-sectional analysis of the antibiotic prescriptions on a geriatric ward. This included looking at the antibiotic prescribed, indication, duration, route of administration and presence of a review date. These were then compared to trust guidelines. After the first 8-weeks, we delivered a departmental teaching session on antibiotic prescriptions. We then re-audited the prescriptions. Following this, we sent out weekly email reminders on locating trust guidelines and information on prescriptions. We then re-audited following this. Finally, we created an e-learning resource to deliver to the ward on antibiotic prescriptions. We are planning to deliver this to the ward and re-audit afterwards. Results Initially, up to 90.0% of prescriptions differed from trust guidelines. Common reasons for differences when compared included incorrect drug prescribed, incorrect frequency of dosing, or non-specific indications leading to difficulty comparing. Following all interventions, approximately 32% of prescriptions differed from trust guidelines. This showed sustained improvement across 2 complete PDSA cycles (plan, do, study, act). A 3rd PDSA cycle is ongoing at present and preliminary data has shown approximately 28% of prescriptions differed from trust guidelines. Conclusion This quality improvement project has successfully contributed to a reduction in prescription errors and safe prescribing. We will continue to provide information to our colleagues on antibiotic stewardship, to further encourage safe prescribing. [1]. Antibiotic resistance (2020) World Health Organisation. Available at: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance (Accessed: May 2023).

Age and AgeingVol. 53(Supplement_3)
Croydon University Hospital (GB)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

2259 Assessing antibiotic usage on a geriatric ward — Matt Truman, R Rawoo, et al. · Age and Ageing (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS