2269 Preventing frailty crises: improving the care of frail patients in an acute hospital Ward setting

Abstract Introduction Frailty is common in hospitalised older patients and hospitalisation can lead to negative outcomes. Our study aimed to provide insights into current decision-making processes on treatment, care and discharge by clinical teams. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in frail older patients ≥65 years old admitted to acute medical and surgical wards. Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5 was used to identify frail patients and process mapping was undertaken to identify common themes, trajectories and potentially modifiable factors. We followed patient journeys from admission to discharge and examined factors contributing to longer hospitalisation. We documented existing processes, environmental, system and clinical factors influencing patient care. Comprehensive geriatric assessments identified underlying geriatric syndromes and where gaps in management were identified, we recommended frailty interventions. Results Fifteen patients provided informed consent, of whom 73% were female and average age 80 years, ranging 69–95 years. 67% were frail (CFS 5–6) and 33% were severely frail (CFS 7–9). Most patients were sarcopenic with a SARC-F score of ≥4 and had functional and gait impairment. 60% were underweight (BMI <22). Process mapping revealed gaps in frailty-focused care and included delayed transfer to acute wards, delayed investigations, and multiple unidentified geriatric syndromes which were prevalent in this cohort. Patients fell into three broad groups, short (1–6 days), intermediate (7–14 days), or long (>14 days) length of stay and delays in discharge-planning were common, mean of 4.17 days, as were delays in identification of a caregiver. Recommendations for community support services were provided to >50% patients. Conclusion Our study shows that mapping the frail patient’s journey can identify gaps in existing processes and opportunities for improvement and collaboration. Integrating geriatric care into general wards could improve patient outcomes. We aim to use this work to guide frailty-attuned care for hospitalised older patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Age and Ageing
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae139.047
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

2269 Preventing frailty crises: improving the care of frail patients in an acute hospital Ward setting

T.P.S. Dhaliwal, Barbara Helen Rosario, Simon Conroy, Fan Li et al.
Age and Ageing
Frailty in Older Adults
article

2269 Preventing frailty crises: improving the care of frail patients in an acute hospital Ward setting

T.P.S. Dhaliwal, Barbara Helen Rosario, Simon Conroy, Fan Li, RT Tan-Pantano, WDV Espelata, G Semeniano, TD Oo, RSY Teng, VC Barrera, SN Teoh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Frailty is common in hospitalised older patients and hospitalisation can lead to negative outcomes. Our study aimed to provide insights into current decision-making processes on treatment, care and discharge by clinical teams. Methods We conducted a prospective cohort study in frail older patients ≥65 years old admitted to acute medical and surgical wards. Clinical Frailty Scale ≥5 was used to identify frail patients and process mapping was undertaken to identify common themes, trajectories and potentially modifiable factors. We followed patient journeys from admission to discharge and examined factors contributing to longer hospitalisation. We documented existing processes, environmental, system and clinical factors influencing patient care. Comprehensive geriatric assessments identified underlying geriatric syndromes and where gaps in management were identified, we recommended frailty interventions. Results Fifteen patients provided informed consent, of whom 73% were female and average age 80 years, ranging 69–95 years. 67% were frail (CFS 5–6) and 33% were severely frail (CFS 7–9). Most patients were sarcopenic with a SARC-F score of ≥4 and had functional and gait impairment. 60% were underweight (BMI <22). Process mapping revealed gaps in frailty-focused care and included delayed transfer to acute wards, delayed investigations, and multiple unidentified geriatric syndromes which were prevalent in this cohort. Patients fell into three broad groups, short (1–6 days), intermediate (7–14 days), or long (>14 days) length of stay and delays in discharge-planning were common, mean of 4.17 days, as were delays in identification of a caregiver. Recommendations for community support services were provided to >50% patients. Conclusion Our study shows that mapping the frail patient’s journey can identify gaps in existing processes and opportunities for improvement and collaboration. Integrating geriatric care into general wards could improve patient outcomes. We aim to use this work to guide frailty-attuned care for hospitalised older patients.

Age and AgeingVol. 53(Supplement_3)
SingHealth (SG), Changi General Hospital (SG), University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.