Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy for management of complex appendiceal polyps extending into the appendiceal orifice

<b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice (AO) polyps extending inside the appendiceal lumen is challenging given the inability to determine polyp lateral margins and risk of appendicitis. Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) ensures en bloc resection of these complex polyps. <b>Patients and methods</b> This case series includes patients who underwent TEA by a single endoscopist in the United States. Technical success was defined as achieving complete removal of the appendix along with AO polyp in an en bloc fashion. <b>Results</b> In total, nine patients were included (mean age 69.7 ± 9.6 years). The average appendix size was 4.07 ± 2.02 cm. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients. The average procedure length was 118.1 ± 44.21 minutes. The en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rates were 100%. Patients were observed for an average of 3.1 ± 1.6 days. One patient developed loculated fluid collection 9 days post procedure, which resolved on its own with oral antibiotic therapy. No other adverse events were recorded. <b>Conclusions</b> This was an early study of the feasibility of TEA in the United States. This novel technique, in early-stage development, is potentially safe and associated with a minimal risk profile in expert hands. Further prospective studies are needed to standardize the technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy International Open
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2356-6711
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy for management of complex appendiceal polyps extending into the appendiceal orifice

Tara Keihanian, Salmaan Jawaid, Fuad Z. Aloor, Mai Khalaf et al.
2 citations
Endoscopy International Open
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
0.57
article

Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy for management of complex appendiceal polyps extending into the appendiceal orifice

Tara Keihanian, Salmaan Jawaid, Fuad Z. Aloor, Mai Khalaf, Mohamed O. Othman, Dina Zamil
article en
2 citations

Abstract

<b>Background and study aims</b> Endoscopic resection of appendiceal orifice (AO) polyps extending inside the appendiceal lumen is challenging given the inability to determine polyp lateral margins and risk of appendicitis. Transcecal endoscopic appendectomy (TEA) ensures en bloc resection of these complex polyps. <b>Patients and methods</b> This case series includes patients who underwent TEA by a single endoscopist in the United States. Technical success was defined as achieving complete removal of the appendix along with AO polyp in an en bloc fashion. <b>Results</b> In total, nine patients were included (mean age 69.7 ± 9.6 years). The average appendix size was 4.07 ± 2.02 cm. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients. The average procedure length was 118.1 ± 44.21 minutes. The en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, and curative resection rates were 100%. Patients were observed for an average of 3.1 ± 1.6 days. One patient developed loculated fluid collection 9 days post procedure, which resolved on its own with oral antibiotic therapy. No other adverse events were recorded. <b>Conclusions</b> This was an early study of the feasibility of TEA in the United States. This novel technique, in early-stage development, is potentially safe and associated with a minimal risk profile in expert hands. Further prospective studies are needed to standardize the technique.

Endoscopy International OpenVol. 12(08)
Baylor College of Medicine (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.