Traditional Chinese‐version reliability test of the Pieper‐Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge: Psychometric and assessment

This study was to translate the Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test (PZ-PUKT) into Traditional Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties as well as identify the predictors of knowledge on pressure injury. The PZ-PUKT was translated into Traditional Chinese (TC-PZ-PUKT), and its content validity was evaluated. A total of 296 nurses participated in this study and completed the 72-item TC-PZ-PUKT online. The reliability of the TC-PZ-PUKT was analysed by evaluating its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Hierarchical regression was used to determine factors associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. Content validity was achieved with a score of 0.986. Internal consistency was observed to be reliable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.858. The mean knowledge score on the TC-PZ-PUKT was 72.5%, with a 1-week test-retest reliability of r = 0.849. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning through reading articles, books or guidelines on pressure injury were significantly associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. The TC-PZ-PUKT is a valid and reliable tool. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning regarding pressure injury are related to knowledge of pressure injury.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Wound Journal
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70017
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Traditional Chinese‐version reliability test of the Pieper‐Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge: Psychometric and assessment

Wen‐Yi Chao, Yu‐Lin Wu, Yu‐Chen Kuo, Zih‐Chun Huang et al.
4 citations
International Wound Journal
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
6.87
article

Traditional Chinese‐version reliability test of the Pieper‐Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge: Psychometric and assessment

Wen‐Yi Chao, Yu‐Lin Wu, Yu‐Chen Kuo, Zih‐Chun Huang, Su‐Ru Chen, Tzu‐Ling Wu, Mei‐Yu Hsu
article en
4 citations

Abstract

This study was to translate the Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test (PZ-PUKT) into Traditional Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties as well as identify the predictors of knowledge on pressure injury. The PZ-PUKT was translated into Traditional Chinese (TC-PZ-PUKT), and its content validity was evaluated. A total of 296 nurses participated in this study and completed the 72-item TC-PZ-PUKT online. The reliability of the TC-PZ-PUKT was analysed by evaluating its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Hierarchical regression was used to determine factors associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. Content validity was achieved with a score of 0.986. Internal consistency was observed to be reliable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.858. The mean knowledge score on the TC-PZ-PUKT was 72.5%, with a 1-week test-retest reliability of r = 0.849. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning through reading articles, books or guidelines on pressure injury were significantly associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. The TC-PZ-PUKT is a valid and reliable tool. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning regarding pressure injury are related to knowledge of pressure injury.

International Wound JournalVol. 21(8)
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), Asia University (TW), Tzu Chi Foundation (TW), Cathay General Hospital (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW), Wan Fang Hospital (TW), Taipei Medical University (TW)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
6.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Traditional Chinese‐version reliability test of the Pieper‐Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge: Psychometric and assessment — Wen‐Yi Chao, Yu‐Lin Wu, et al. · International Wound Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS