Traditional Chinese‐version reliability test of the Pieper‐Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge: Psychometric and assessment
This study was to translate the Pieper-Zulkowski pressure ulcer knowledge test (PZ-PUKT) into Traditional Chinese and evaluate its psychometric properties as well as identify the predictors of knowledge on pressure injury. The PZ-PUKT was translated into Traditional Chinese (TC-PZ-PUKT), and its content validity was evaluated. A total of 296 nurses participated in this study and completed the 72-item TC-PZ-PUKT online. The reliability of the TC-PZ-PUKT was analysed by evaluating its internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Hierarchical regression was used to determine factors associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. Content validity was achieved with a score of 0.986. Internal consistency was observed to be reliable, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.858. The mean knowledge score on the TC-PZ-PUKT was 72.5%, with a 1-week test-retest reliability of r = 0.849. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning through reading articles, books or guidelines on pressure injury were significantly associated with TC-PZ-PUKT scores. The TC-PZ-PUKT is a valid and reliable tool. Education level, certification as a wound specialist and self-learning regarding pressure injury are related to knowledge of pressure injury.
Authors
- Wen‐Yi Chao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5052-8709)
- Yu‐Lin Wu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9480-4442)
- Yu‐Chen Kuo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0569-1002)
- Zih‐Chun Huang
- Su‐Ru Chen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9765-0517)
- Tzu‐Ling Wu
- Mei‐Yu Hsu
Institutions
- Fu Jen Catholic University (TW)
- Asia University (TW)
- Tzu Chi Foundation (TW)
- Cathay General Hospital (TW)
- National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
- Wan Fang Hospital (TW)
- Taipei Medical University (TW)
Publication Details
- Journal
- International Wound Journal
- Published
- 2024-08-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70017
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 6.87