A “Question of National Honour” – Status Concerns in Tanzania’s Response to the Invasion by Uganda in 1978

Abstract Tanzania’s response to the invasion by Uganda in 1978 reveals a puzzle that previous scholars of the subject have overlooked. The country resorted to a full-scale war against Uganda, even after recovering its territory, and chose such a costly option when its economy was in a dire situation. Previous scholars emphasised security and revenge as the key motives underpinning the response. This paper, which is based on key informant interviews and archival research, argues that the counterintuitive nature of the response can only be sufficiently understood by factoring in the country’s sensitivity to status transgressions in its first two decades of independence. The invasion by Uganda took place against the backdrop of a state increasingly sensitive to its standing. This paper uses the status-dissatisfaction theory to argue that the response was informed not only by the national security logic, but also the need to defend the country’s status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The African Review
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1163/1821889x-bja10135
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Political Conflict and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A “Question of National Honour” – Status Concerns in Tanzania’s Response to the Invasion by Uganda in 1978

D. Kweka
1 citations
The African Review
Political Conflict and Governance
1.13
article

A “Question of National Honour” – Status Concerns in Tanzania’s Response to the Invasion by Uganda in 1978

D. Kweka
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Tanzania’s response to the invasion by Uganda in 1978 reveals a puzzle that previous scholars of the subject have overlooked. The country resorted to a full-scale war against Uganda, even after recovering its territory, and chose such a costly option when its economy was in a dire situation. Previous scholars emphasised security and revenge as the key motives underpinning the response. This paper, which is based on key informant interviews and archival research, argues that the counterintuitive nature of the response can only be sufficiently understood by factoring in the country’s sensitivity to status transgressions in its first two decades of independence. The invasion by Uganda took place against the backdrop of a state increasingly sensitive to its standing. This paper uses the status-dissatisfaction theory to argue that the response was informed not only by the national security logic, but also the need to defend the country’s status.

The African Review
University of Dar es Salaam (TZ)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Political Conflict and Governance
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.