The frog model on Galton–Watson trees

We consider an interacting particle system on trees known as the frog model: initially, a single active particle begins at the root and i.i.d. Poiss(λ) many inactive particles are placed at each nonroot vertex. Active particles perform discrete time simple random walk and activate the inactive particles they encounter. We show that for Galton–Watson trees with offspring distributions Z satisfying P(Z≥2)=1 and E[Z4+ε]<∞ for some ε>0, there is a critical value λc∈(0,∞) separating recurrent and transient regimes for almost surely every tree, thereby answering a question of Hoffman–Johnson–Junge. In addition, we also establish that this critical parameter depends on the entire offspring distribution, not just the maximum value of Z, answering another question of Hoffman–Johnson–Junge and showing that the frog model and contact process behave differently on Galton–Watson trees.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Annals of Applied Probability
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1214/24-aap2054
Primary Topic
Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The frog model on Galton–Watson trees

Josh Rosenberg, Marcus Michelen
The Annals of Applied Probability
Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
article

The frog model on Galton–Watson trees

Josh Rosenberg, Marcus Michelen
article en

Abstract

We consider an interacting particle system on trees known as the frog model: initially, a single active particle begins at the root and i.i.d. Poiss(λ) many inactive particles are placed at each nonroot vertex. Active particles perform discrete time simple random walk and activate the inactive particles they encounter. We show that for Galton–Watson trees with offspring distributions Z satisfying P(Z≥2)=1 and E[Z4+ε]<∞ for some ε>0, there is a critical value λc∈(0,∞) separating recurrent and transient regimes for almost surely every tree, thereby answering a question of Hoffman–Johnson–Junge. In addition, we also establish that this critical parameter depends on the entire offspring distribution, not just the maximum value of Z, answering another question of Hoffman–Johnson–Junge and showing that the frog model and contact process behave differently on Galton–Watson trees.

The Annals of Applied ProbabilityVol. 34(4)
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.