Newly and Previously Eligible Medicaid Enrollees Differ, but Not in Health Care Expenditures

In 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded the role of Medicaid by encouraging states to increase eligibility for lower-income adults. As of 2024, 10 states had not adopted the expanded eligibility provisions of the ACA, possibly due to concerns about the state's share of spending. Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we documented how health care utilization, expenditures, and the overall health status of newly eligible enrollees compare with enrollees who would have been eligible under their states' rules before the ACA. Our estimates suggest that, during 2014-16, newly eligible Medicaid enrollees had worse health and greater utilization and expenditures than previously eligible enrollees. However, during 2017-19, newly and previously eligible enrollees had comparable per capita health expenditures across six types of health spending. We find some evidence that changes in Medicaid enrollment composition muted observed differences between eligibility groups.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.2024.a934299
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Newly and Previously Eligible Medicaid Enrollees Differ, but Not in Health Care Expenditures

Paul Jacobs, Steven Hill, Jessica N. Monnet
Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Newly and Previously Eligible Medicaid Enrollees Differ, but Not in Health Care Expenditures

Paul Jacobs, Steven Hill, Jessica N. Monnet
article en

Abstract

In 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) expanded the role of Medicaid by encouraging states to increase eligibility for lower-income adults. As of 2024, 10 states had not adopted the expanded eligibility provisions of the ACA, possibly due to concerns about the state's share of spending. Using the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), we documented how health care utilization, expenditures, and the overall health status of newly eligible enrollees compare with enrollees who would have been eligible under their states' rules before the ACA. Our estimates suggest that, during 2014-16, newly eligible Medicaid enrollees had worse health and greater utilization and expenditures than previously eligible enrollees. However, during 2017-19, newly and previously eligible enrollees had comparable per capita health expenditures across six types of health spending. We find some evidence that changes in Medicaid enrollment composition muted observed differences between eligibility groups.

Journal of Health Care for the Poor and UnderservedVol. 35(3)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Newly and Previously Eligible Medicaid Enrollees Differ, but Not in Health Care Expenditures — Paul Jacobs, Steven Hill, et al. · Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS