IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES OF JURISDICTION

                The article is devoted to the formation of an up-to-date scientific opinion on the peculiarities of the implementation of judicial control over compliance by pre-trial investigation bodies with their powers in accordance with the subjectivity of criminal proceedings. The article analyzes the peculiarities of judicial control by investigating judges at the stage of pre-trial investigation. Approaches to the classification of the judicial control function have been revealed. The article notes that the key direction of judicial control is the current Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, which determines the control over compliance with the protection of human rights, and the reaction to the manifestation of violations of such rights. It was determined that there is a gap in the clear mechanism of judicial control over the powers of pre-trial investigation bodies in the aspect of compliance with criminal proceedings. In particular, the existing legal basis of judicial control does not allow investigating judges to effectively monitor the compliance of pre-trial investigation bodies with respect to liability. The lack of specific criteria for the reaction of investigating judges to violations that manifest themselves in the process of implementation by pre-trial investigation bodies of their procedural rights becomes the reason for establishing procedural violations that directly affect the course of court proceedings. It is emphasized separately that the presence of a clear mechanism of judicial control over compliance by pre-trial investigation bodies with the rules of jurisdiction will allow to avoid investigation by unauthorized bodies. At the same time, the number of violations allowed by investigators will significantly decrease, and accordingly, the level of recognition of evidence as inadmissible at the stage of the trial, as obtained by an unauthorized entity, will decrease. It is proposed to initiate changes to the current legislation regarding the expansion and detailing of the powers of investigative judges in terms of judicial control over compliance by pre-trial investigation bodies with the rules of accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Notes Series Law
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36550/2522-9230-2024-16-203-207
Primary Topic
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES OF JURISDICTION

I. A. Smolyak
Scientific Notes Series Law
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
article

IMPLEMENTATION OF JUDICIAL CONTROL OVER COMPLIANCE WITH THE RULES OF JURISDICTION

I. A. Smolyak
article en

Abstract

                The article is devoted to the formation of an up-to-date scientific opinion on the peculiarities of the implementation of judicial control over compliance by pre-trial investigation bodies with their powers in accordance with the subjectivity of criminal proceedings. The article analyzes the peculiarities of judicial control by investigating judges at the stage of pre-trial investigation. Approaches to the classification of the judicial control function have been revealed. The article notes that the key direction of judicial control is the current Code of Criminal Procedure of Ukraine, which determines the control over compliance with the protection of human rights, and the reaction to the manifestation of violations of such rights. It was determined that there is a gap in the clear mechanism of judicial control over the powers of pre-trial investigation bodies in the aspect of compliance with criminal proceedings. In particular, the existing legal basis of judicial control does not allow investigating judges to effectively monitor the compliance of pre-trial investigation bodies with respect to liability. The lack of specific criteria for the reaction of investigating judges to violations that manifest themselves in the process of implementation by pre-trial investigation bodies of their procedural rights becomes the reason for establishing procedural violations that directly affect the course of court proceedings. It is emphasized separately that the presence of a clear mechanism of judicial control over compliance by pre-trial investigation bodies with the rules of jurisdiction will allow to avoid investigation by unauthorized bodies. At the same time, the number of violations allowed by investigators will significantly decrease, and accordingly, the level of recognition of evidence as inadmissible at the stage of the trial, as obtained by an unauthorized entity, will decrease. It is proposed to initiate changes to the current legislation regarding the expansion and detailing of the powers of investigative judges in terms of judicial control over compliance by pre-trial investigation bodies with the rules of accountability.

Scientific Notes Series LawVol. 1(16)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Ukrainian Legal and Forensic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.