Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland

Abstract The Rover–Aerial Vehicle Exploration Network project field-tested planetary mission operations within a Mars analog environment in Iceland using stand-alone rover and helicopter architectures. Mission planning, implementation, and results are reported for the rover mission and briefly summarized for the helicopter mission. The outcomes of both missions are subsequently compared. Field implementation occurred from 2022 July to August at the Holuhraun lava flow. The rover science operations team executed a 14 sol (Martian day) mission that achieved mission, science, and sampling goals, including the contextualization, acquisition, and planned caching of two eolian and two rock samples. The helicopter science operations team executed a plan of comparable length but emphasized different science goals given long-range flight capabilities and landing limitations. The resolution and targetability of the rover payload enabled more detailed analyses, whereas the helicopter was better able to map flow-scale morphologies. The rover’s exploration was limited by daily mobility duration limits and hazardous terrain, whereas the helicopter’s exploration was constrained by landing site hazards. Resource limitations resulted from lengthier rover drives and data-volume-intensive helicopter imaging surveys. Future missions using combined rover–helicopter architectures should account for each spacecraft’s resource needs and acknowledge system strengths in different geologic settings. Both missions served to establish operations strategies and mission outcomes to be applied to future combined rover and helicopter mission architectures, while the helicopter mission also evaluated strategies and outcomes for future stand-alone airborne missions. Findings in this work are relevant to future missions seeking to optimize strategies for planetary mission operations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Planetary Science Journal
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/psj/ad55f4
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.66
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland

J. R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton, Jahnavi Shah, B. B. Carr et al.
5 citations
The Planetary Science Journal
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.66
article

Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland

J. R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton, Jahnavi Shah, B. B. Carr, Nathan Hadland, Matthew Varnam, Samantha Gwizd, J. Moersch, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Michael Phillips, Raymond Francis, Kathryn M. Stack, Udit Basu, Fred Calef, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract The Rover–Aerial Vehicle Exploration Network project field-tested planetary mission operations within a Mars analog environment in Iceland using stand-alone rover and helicopter architectures. Mission planning, implementation, and results are reported for the rover mission and briefly summarized for the helicopter mission. The outcomes of both missions are subsequently compared. Field implementation occurred from 2022 July to August at the Holuhraun lava flow. The rover science operations team executed a 14 sol (Martian day) mission that achieved mission, science, and sampling goals, including the contextualization, acquisition, and planned caching of two eolian and two rock samples. The helicopter science operations team executed a plan of comparable length but emphasized different science goals given long-range flight capabilities and landing limitations. The resolution and targetability of the rover payload enabled more detailed analyses, whereas the helicopter was better able to map flow-scale morphologies. The rover’s exploration was limited by daily mobility duration limits and hazardous terrain, whereas the helicopter’s exploration was constrained by landing site hazards. Resource limitations resulted from lengthier rover drives and data-volume-intensive helicopter imaging surveys. Future missions using combined rover–helicopter architectures should account for each spacecraft’s resource needs and acknowledge system strengths in different geologic settings. Both missions served to establish operations strategies and mission outcomes to be applied to future combined rover and helicopter mission architectures, while the helicopter mission also evaluated strategies and outcomes for future stand-alone airborne missions. Findings in this work are relevant to future missions seeking to optimize strategies for planetary mission operations.

The Planetary Science JournalVol. 5(8)
Reykjavík University (IS), Western University (CA), Jet Propulsion Laboratory (US), University of Arizona (US), University of Tennessee at Knoxville (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.66
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.