An astronomical analysis of the data in the pseudo-Hipparchus palimpsest in the Codex Climaci Rescriptus

In 2022, Gysembergh et al. published a paper in JHA claiming ‘New evidence for Hipparchus’ Star Catalogue’. In this paper we challenge this hypothesis by stating that (a) we disagree with their astronomical dating and find inconsistencies by using the given numbers, and (b) the terminology and the data format used in the palimpsest do not match Hipparchus or anybody else. Therefore, the palimpsest does not prove anything about Hipparchus’s star catalogue nor did Hipparchus use rectangular constellation borders. Specifically, the constellation of Corona Borealis, typically depicted as a circle since Babylonian times, is not considered a rectangle by Hipparchus. Furthermore, a palimpsest that cannot be dated properly does not confirm the long-known relationship between Hipparchus and Ptolemy as the authors claim.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00218286241256345
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An astronomical analysis of the data in the pseudo-Hipparchus palimpsest in the Codex Climaci Rescriptus

Susanne M. Hoffmann, Gerd Graßhoff
1 citations
Journal for the History of Astronomy
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
0.33
article

An astronomical analysis of the data in the pseudo-Hipparchus palimpsest in the Codex Climaci Rescriptus

Susanne M. Hoffmann, Gerd Graßhoff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In 2022, Gysembergh et al. published a paper in JHA claiming ‘New evidence for Hipparchus’ Star Catalogue’. In this paper we challenge this hypothesis by stating that (a) we disagree with their astronomical dating and find inconsistencies by using the given numbers, and (b) the terminology and the data format used in the palimpsest do not match Hipparchus or anybody else. Therefore, the palimpsest does not prove anything about Hipparchus’s star catalogue nor did Hipparchus use rectangular constellation borders. Specifically, the constellation of Corona Borealis, typically depicted as a circle since Babylonian times, is not considered a rectangle by Hipparchus. Furthermore, a palimpsest that cannot be dated properly does not confirm the long-known relationship between Hipparchus and Ptolemy as the authors claim.

Journal for the History of AstronomyVol. 55(3)
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 35%
Historical Astronomy and Related Studies
0.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.