Legalizing transphobia: from courtroom to legislature, how gender‐critical activism is hurting us all

Abstract This article scrutinizes the strategic legal and political actions taken by gender‐critical feminist (GCF) scholars and activists aimed at curtailing protections afforded under existing equality law and criminal justice policies that safeguard transgender individuals against discrimination and victimization. Two prominent legal judgments are critically reviewed to highlight the phenomenon of crowdfunded litigation and to exemplify the ways in which the law can be (mis)used to shape public perceptions of trans identities and, consequently, how this impacts trans individuals’ full and equal participation in society. The subsequent analysis examines how the previous and current governments’ support of the GCF movement has led to newly proposed, and recently enacted, legislation and policies restricting trans rights and legal protections. The article concludes by reflecting on how these coordinated legal interventions detrimentally affect the emotional, physical, and social well‐being of trans individuals, while simultaneously contributing to a broader political narrative aimed at dismantling protections against discrimination and victimization for all marginalized groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Law and Society
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12491
Citations
10
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.44
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legalizing transphobia: from courtroom to legislature, how gender‐critical activism is hurting us all

Mark Austin Walters
10 citations
Journal of Law and Society
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
6.44
article

Legalizing transphobia: from courtroom to legislature, how gender‐critical activism is hurting us all

Mark Austin Walters
article en
10 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article scrutinizes the strategic legal and political actions taken by gender‐critical feminist (GCF) scholars and activists aimed at curtailing protections afforded under existing equality law and criminal justice policies that safeguard transgender individuals against discrimination and victimization. Two prominent legal judgments are critically reviewed to highlight the phenomenon of crowdfunded litigation and to exemplify the ways in which the law can be (mis)used to shape public perceptions of trans identities and, consequently, how this impacts trans individuals’ full and equal participation in society. The subsequent analysis examines how the previous and current governments’ support of the GCF movement has led to newly proposed, and recently enacted, legislation and policies restricting trans rights and legal protections. The article concludes by reflecting on how these coordinated legal interventions detrimentally affect the emotional, physical, and social well‐being of trans individuals, while simultaneously contributing to a broader political narrative aimed at dismantling protections against discrimination and victimization for all marginalized groups.

Journal of Law and SocietyVol. 51(3)
University of Sussex (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
6.44
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legalizing transphobia: from courtroom to legislature, how gender‐critical activism is hurting us all — Mark Austin Walters · Journal of Law and Society (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS