Farmer‐led badger vaccination in Cornwall: Epidemiological patterns and social perspectives
Abstract In the United Kingdom, the management of bovine tuberculosis (bTB) challenges the coexistence of people and wildlife. Control of this cattle disease is hindered by transmission of its causative agent, Mycobacterium bovis , between cattle and badgers Meles meles . Badger culling has formed an element of bTB control policy for decades, but current government policy envisions expanding badger vaccination. Farming leaders are sceptical, citing concerns that badger vaccination would be impractical and potentially ineffective. We report on a 4‐year badger vaccination initiative in an 11 km 2 area which, atypically, was initiated by local farmers, delivered by scientists and conservationists, and co‐funded by all three. Participating landholders cited controversies around culling and a desire to support neighbours as their primary reasons for adopting vaccination. The number of badgers vaccinated per km 2 (5.6 km −2 in 2019) exceeded the number culled on nearby land (2.9 km −2 in 2019), and the estimated proportion vaccinated (74%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 40%–137%) exceeded the 30% threshold predicted by models to be necessary to control M. bovis . Farmers were content with how vaccination was delivered, and felt that it built trust with wildlife professionals. The percentage of badgers testing positive for M. bovis declined from 16.0% (95% CI 4.5%–36.1%) at the start of vaccination to 0% (95% CI 0%–9.7%) in the final year. With neither replication nor unvaccinated controls, this small‐scale case study does not demonstrate a causal link between badger vaccination and bTB epidemiology, but it does suggest that larger‐scale evaluation of badger vaccination would be warranted. Farmers reported that their enthusiasm for badger vaccination had increased after participating for 4 years. They considered vaccination to have been effective, and good value for money, and wished to continue with it. Synthesis and applications : Although small‐scale, this case study suggests that badger vaccination can be a technically effective and socially acceptable component of bTB control. A wider rollout of badger vaccination is more likely if it is led by the farming community, rather than by conservationists or government, and is combined with scientific monitoring. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Authors
- Cheryl Marriott
- Christl Ann Donnelly (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0195-2463)
- Verity Miles (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-7064-5488)
- J. Marcus Rowcliffe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4286-6887)
- Kelly Astley (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4057-8491)
- Cally Ham (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9281-038X)
- Caroline Howe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0989-1634)
- Peter N. M. Brotherton (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4341-9664)
- Roșie Woodroffe (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2104-3133)
- Henry Grub (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6316-0998)
- Chris Jones (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5044-1336)
- Tom Shelley
- Keith Truscott
- Rose Barnecut
Institutions
- Zoological Society of London (GB)
- Natural England (GB)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Vincent Wildlife Trust (GB)
- Imperial College London (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- People and Nature
- Published
- 2024-08-05
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10691
- Citations
- 4
- Primary Topic
- Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.27
Funders
- Zoological Society of London
- Garfield Weston Foundation
- Natural England
- Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK Government
- Public Health England
- Natural Environment Research Council
- Research England