Lively commodities and endemic diseases: Shifting commodity situations and nonhuman disability in cattle and sheep on UK farms

The concept of ‘lively commodities’ captures how aspects of the life of certain entities affect their commodification and exchange within capitalist economic systems. Their status as being, or comprised of, living things matters to their commodification in different ways in particular places and spaces and at particular times. This paper uses the empirical example of diseased farmed animals in the north of England to examine the effects of susceptibility to disease on the process of lively commodification, drawing on conceptualisations of nonhuman disability and relations of care alongside literature on lively commodities, and exploring cases of multi-lifeform co-production of disease. It thus focuses on moments where the liveliness of animals means that commodification ‘goes wrong’, because liveliness means susceptibility to injury and disease, alongside its potential for economic production. The paper focuses on two important endemic conditions affecting UK farming: lameness in cattle and sheep, and bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) in cattle. These conditions significantly affect animals' welfare and impact on farm productivity. Drawing on qualitative analysis of transcripts from in-depth interviews with 29 farmers and 21 farm advisers (e.g. vets), the paper examines three empirical themes where farming practices are strongly affected by the lively nature of the commodities being produced: first, the anticipatory practice of breeding animals resistant or vulnerable to disease; second, lameness and nonhuman disability; and third, BVD and threats to agricultural biosecurity. The paper concludes by revisiting the concept of lively commodities in situations where farmed animals are diseased, and reflects on the implications of this for their shifting commodity status in particular times and places. • Farming practices and the treatment of endemic livestock diseases are affected by the ‘lively’ nature of farmed animals. • Focusing on endemic diseases provides new perspectives on farmed animals as ‘lively commodities’ and on ‘nonhuman disability’ as experienced by animals. • Lively commodity and nonhuman disability concepts provide new perspectives on breeding practices and disease treatment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2024-08-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2024.103367
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.14

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lively commodities and endemic diseases: Shifting commodity situations and nonhuman disability in cattle and sheep on UK farms

Lewis Holloway, Amy Proctor, Beth Clark, Niamh Mahon
2 citations
Journal of Rural Studies
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
1.14
article

Lively commodities and endemic diseases: Shifting commodity situations and nonhuman disability in cattle and sheep on UK farms

Lewis Holloway, Amy Proctor, Beth Clark, Niamh Mahon
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The concept of ‘lively commodities’ captures how aspects of the life of certain entities affect their commodification and exchange within capitalist economic systems. Their status as being, or comprised of, living things matters to their commodification in different ways in particular places and spaces and at particular times. This paper uses the empirical example of diseased farmed animals in the north of England to examine the effects of susceptibility to disease on the process of lively commodification, drawing on conceptualisations of nonhuman disability and relations of care alongside literature on lively commodities, and exploring cases of multi-lifeform co-production of disease. It thus focuses on moments where the liveliness of animals means that commodification ‘goes wrong’, because liveliness means susceptibility to injury and disease, alongside its potential for economic production. The paper focuses on two important endemic conditions affecting UK farming: lameness in cattle and sheep, and bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) in cattle. These conditions significantly affect animals' welfare and impact on farm productivity. Drawing on qualitative analysis of transcripts from in-depth interviews with 29 farmers and 21 farm advisers (e.g. vets), the paper examines three empirical themes where farming practices are strongly affected by the lively nature of the commodities being produced: first, the anticipatory practice of breeding animals resistant or vulnerable to disease; second, lameness and nonhuman disability; and third, BVD and threats to agricultural biosecurity. The paper concludes by revisiting the concept of lively commodities in situations where farmed animals are diseased, and reflects on the implications of this for their shifting commodity status in particular times and places. • Farming practices and the treatment of endemic livestock diseases are affected by the ‘lively’ nature of farmed animals. • Focusing on endemic diseases provides new perspectives on farmed animals as ‘lively commodities’ and on ‘nonhuman disability’ as experienced by animals. • Lively commodity and nonhuman disability concepts provide new perspectives on breeding practices and disease treatment.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 110
James Hutton Institute (GB), University of Hull (GB), Newcastle University (GB)
Wellcome Trust
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
1.14
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.