Shared space and resource use within a building environment: An indoor geography

Abstract Indoor spaces are essential to most humans' lives. Furthermore, in many cases, buildings are shared indoor environments that contain diverse people and resources. Spatial patterns of use are important but under‐examined aspects of human‐building interactions. This study leverages perspectives from human‐environment geography and mechanical engineering to examine spatial patterns of use within a network of shared indoor spaces in an academic building at a research university in the United States. Here we ask: (1) What spaces and resources do building users value? and (2) How are values associated with observed measures of use? We hypothesise that spatial patterns of use follow an ideal free distribution (IFD), a common ecological model of resource use. To test this, we define measures of value and use derived from mixed qualitative ( n = 50) and survey‐based social data ( n = 196) and data from a building‐based system of accelerometers. Our analyses provide some support for the IFD hypothesis. We discuss the implications of this finding and potential new avenues for geographic research in shared indoor environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geographical Journal
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12604
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.41

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Shared space and resource use within a building environment: An indoor geography

Thomas J. Pingel, Timothy D. Baird, Pablo A. Tarazaga, David J. Kniola et al.
5 citations
Geographical Journal
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.41
article

Shared space and resource use within a building environment: An indoor geography

Thomas J. Pingel, Timothy D. Baird, Pablo A. Tarazaga, David J. Kniola, Rodrigo Sarlo, Mark Villarreal
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Indoor spaces are essential to most humans' lives. Furthermore, in many cases, buildings are shared indoor environments that contain diverse people and resources. Spatial patterns of use are important but under‐examined aspects of human‐building interactions. This study leverages perspectives from human‐environment geography and mechanical engineering to examine spatial patterns of use within a network of shared indoor spaces in an academic building at a research university in the United States. Here we ask: (1) What spaces and resources do building users value? and (2) How are values associated with observed measures of use? We hypothesise that spatial patterns of use follow an ideal free distribution (IFD), a common ecological model of resource use. To test this, we define measures of value and use derived from mixed qualitative ( n = 50) and survey‐based social data ( n = 196) and data from a building‐based system of accelerometers. Our analyses provide some support for the IFD hypothesis. We discuss the implications of this finding and potential new avenues for geographic research in shared indoor environments.

Geographical JournalVol. 191(1)
Binghamton University (US), Virginia Tech (US), Texas A&M University (US)
Directorate for Social, Behavioral and Economic Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
1.41
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.