Interference of prototypical geometry representations in students’ construction of concepts and development of proofs

This study investigates the impact of prototypical geometric representations on students' ability to construct accurate geometric concepts and their subsequent performance in proving tasks related to those concepts. Ninety-one 11th-grade students participated in the study. We intentionally designed and utilized a questionnaire as the primary data-collection tool. We used the questionnaire items and findings as a basis for semi-structured interviews that we conducted with approximately 10% of the study participants. This allowed the integration of the quantitative and qualitative analyses, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the learning processes. Our analysis reveals that many Grade 11 students struggle with geometric concept formation due to an overreliance on prototypical examples, which in turn hinders their ability to construct proofs concerning the attributes of these concepts, highlighting the need for more diverse representations in geometry instruction.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2024.2386619
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interference of prototypical geometry representations in students’ construction of concepts and development of proofs

Aehsan Haj-Yahya, Rina Hershkowitz
3 citations
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
6.29
article

Interference of prototypical geometry representations in students’ construction of concepts and development of proofs

Aehsan Haj-Yahya, Rina Hershkowitz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of prototypical geometric representations on students' ability to construct accurate geometric concepts and their subsequent performance in proving tasks related to those concepts. Ninety-one 11th-grade students participated in the study. We intentionally designed and utilized a questionnaire as the primary data-collection tool. We used the questionnaire items and findings as a basis for semi-structured interviews that we conducted with approximately 10% of the study participants. This allowed the integration of the quantitative and qualitative analyses, to provide a comprehensive understanding of the learning processes. Our analysis reveals that many Grade 11 students struggle with geometric concept formation due to an overreliance on prototypical examples, which in turn hinders their ability to construct proofs concerning the attributes of these concepts, highlighting the need for more diverse representations in geometry instruction.

Mathematical Thinking and LearningVol. 28(1)
Beit Berl College (IL), Weizmann Institute of Science (IL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
6.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Interference of prototypical geometry representations in students’ construction of concepts and development of proofs — Aehsan Haj-Yahya, Rina Hershkowitz · Mathematical Thinking and Learning (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS