68 Use of artificial intelligence to derive International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) elements from unstructured medical records

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence technologies invoking large language models (LLMs) may be able to automate data collection for the IMDC registry, an otherwise labor-intensive process. We evaluate a proprietary tool (HopeLLM) in expediting data abstraction. Methods We utilized a City of Hope-managed IMDC data set that includes patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. From this data set, we randomly selected patients who initiated care after 2018 and had sufficient treatment-related information within the Epic electronic health record system to determine HopeLLM performance. Patient identification numbers were manually extracted to prompt HopeLLM for data abstraction. We compared treatment start and end dates between manually registered information and HopeLLM estimations. The difference ratio in months was compared between the two sources. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was performed to quantify the rate of agreement between both sources. Results Among 513 records, 91 patients were randomly selected. A total of 164 lines of treatment were recorded manually in the registry, and 146 were recorded by HopeLLM. A total of 75 lines of treatment were unique to the registry, while 42 were unique to HopeLLM. There were 117 unmatched lines of treatment between the registry and HopeLLM, which were not considered for concordance analysis. We recorded a difference (median (IQR)) of 0 mos (0-0.09 mos) for start dates between the registry and HopeLLM, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95%CI 0.99-0.99). We recorded a difference of 2.15 mos (0.46-5.54 mos) for end dates between the registry and HopeLLM, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.92 (95%CI 0.88-0.95). Conclusions HopeLLM can streamline data abstraction from unstructured medical records onto the IMDC database, as it accurately predicts treatment start and end dates for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae181.055
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

68 Use of artificial intelligence to derive International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) elements from unstructured medical records

Daniela Castro, Miguel Zugman, Benjamin Mercier, Nicholas Salgia et al.
The Oncologist
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

68 Use of artificial intelligence to derive International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) elements from unstructured medical records

Daniela Castro, Miguel Zugman, Benjamin Mercier, Nicholas Salgia, Wesley Yip, Georges Gebrael, Sumanta Kumar Pal, Alex Chehrazi‐Raffle, Kun‐Han Lu, Regina Barragán-Carrillo, Neal Shiv Chawla, Hedyeh Ebrahimi, Nishita Tripathi, Joann Hsu, Salvador Jaime‐Casas, Sina Mehdinia, Kingson Man, Abhishek Tripathi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Artificial intelligence technologies invoking large language models (LLMs) may be able to automate data collection for the IMDC registry, an otherwise labor-intensive process. We evaluate a proprietary tool (HopeLLM) in expediting data abstraction. Methods We utilized a City of Hope-managed IMDC data set that includes patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. From this data set, we randomly selected patients who initiated care after 2018 and had sufficient treatment-related information within the Epic electronic health record system to determine HopeLLM performance. Patient identification numbers were manually extracted to prompt HopeLLM for data abstraction. We compared treatment start and end dates between manually registered information and HopeLLM estimations. The difference ratio in months was compared between the two sources. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient was performed to quantify the rate of agreement between both sources. Results Among 513 records, 91 patients were randomly selected. A total of 164 lines of treatment were recorded manually in the registry, and 146 were recorded by HopeLLM. A total of 75 lines of treatment were unique to the registry, while 42 were unique to HopeLLM. There were 117 unmatched lines of treatment between the registry and HopeLLM, which were not considered for concordance analysis. We recorded a difference (median (IQR)) of 0 mos (0-0.09 mos) for start dates between the registry and HopeLLM, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.99 (95%CI 0.99-0.99). We recorded a difference of 2.15 mos (0.46-5.54 mos) for end dates between the registry and HopeLLM, with a concordance correlation coefficient of 0.92 (95%CI 0.88-0.95). Conclusions HopeLLM can streamline data abstraction from unstructured medical records onto the IMDC database, as it accurately predicts treatment start and end dates for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

The OncologistVol. 29(Supplement_1)
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US), Wayne State University (US), Detroit Medical Center (US), Huntsman Cancer Institute (US), City of Hope (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.