34 Impact of Latino Ethnicity on the gut microbiome composition of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC)

Abstract Background Latinos with mRCC may have poorer outcomes with frontline immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) compared to their non-Latino counterparts (Chehrazi-Raffle et al Oncologist 2023). Recent studies have shown that the composition of the gut microbiome can impact outcomes with ICI (Routy et al Science 2018). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the differences in gut microbiome composition between Latino and non-Latino patients with mRCC. Methods Stool specimens were prospectively collected in treatment-naïve patients with mRCC. We dichotomized patients into Latino vs non-Latino groups. Patients provided a stool sample (OMNIgene Gut) at baseline. Whole metagenome sequencing was performed on stool specimens collected. Taxonomic profiling was conducted using MetaPhlAn 4. ANCOM-BC analysis was used to identify differences in the relative abundance of bacterial species between groups. Alpha-diversity was evaluated using the Shannon diversity index and Evenness analysis, employing the Kruskal-Wallis test. Beta-diversity was assessed using the Bray-Curtis and Jaccard dissimilarity measures. The ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B), a measure of gut dysbiosis, was computed at baseline in the two cohorts. Results Among 59 patients assessed, 27 and 32 were Latino and non-Latino, respectively. Median age of the cohort was 60 (range, 36-90). Most were male (71%), had clear cell RCC (88%) and had intermediate/poor risk disease (79%). ANCOM-BC analysis showed an enrichment of 14 bacterial species and a depletion in 3 species at baseline in the Latino group (p ≤ 0.05). Three Roseburia spp. were enriched in the Latino patients, namely R. faecis (log-fold change [LFC]: 2.6), R. hominis (LFC: 2.0) and R. inulinivorans (LFC: 1.8). Additionally, E. rectale was also enriched in the Latino group (LFC: 2.0). In contrast, in non-Latino patients Methylobacterium spp. was enriched (LFC: 1.3). The F/B ratio was higher in the Latino group as compared to the non-Latino group (1.00 vs 0.92). We did not observe any differences in alpha and beta diversity. Conclusions Our examination of the gut microbiota of pts with mRCC revealed significant differences based on ethnicity at baseline. Specifically, the Latino group exhibited an enhancement of Roseburia spp. and E. rectale, species previously linked to favorable outcomes with ICIs. Our findings suggest that clinical trials related to the microbiome should potentially account for baseline differences in ethnicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyae181.015
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

34 Impact of Latino Ethnicity on the gut microbiome composition of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC)

Regina Barragán-Carrillo
The Oncologist
Gut microbiota and health
article

34 Impact of Latino Ethnicity on the gut microbiome composition of patients with metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC)

Regina Barragán-Carrillo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Latinos with mRCC may have poorer outcomes with frontline immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) compared to their non-Latino counterparts (Chehrazi-Raffle et al Oncologist 2023). Recent studies have shown that the composition of the gut microbiome can impact outcomes with ICI (Routy et al Science 2018). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the differences in gut microbiome composition between Latino and non-Latino patients with mRCC. Methods Stool specimens were prospectively collected in treatment-naïve patients with mRCC. We dichotomized patients into Latino vs non-Latino groups. Patients provided a stool sample (OMNIgene Gut) at baseline. Whole metagenome sequencing was performed on stool specimens collected. Taxonomic profiling was conducted using MetaPhlAn 4. ANCOM-BC analysis was used to identify differences in the relative abundance of bacterial species between groups. Alpha-diversity was evaluated using the Shannon diversity index and Evenness analysis, employing the Kruskal-Wallis test. Beta-diversity was assessed using the Bray-Curtis and Jaccard dissimilarity measures. The ratio of Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes (F/B), a measure of gut dysbiosis, was computed at baseline in the two cohorts. Results Among 59 patients assessed, 27 and 32 were Latino and non-Latino, respectively. Median age of the cohort was 60 (range, 36-90). Most were male (71%), had clear cell RCC (88%) and had intermediate/poor risk disease (79%). ANCOM-BC analysis showed an enrichment of 14 bacterial species and a depletion in 3 species at baseline in the Latino group (p ≤ 0.05). Three Roseburia spp. were enriched in the Latino patients, namely R. faecis (log-fold change [LFC]: 2.6), R. hominis (LFC: 2.0) and R. inulinivorans (LFC: 1.8). Additionally, E. rectale was also enriched in the Latino group (LFC: 2.0). In contrast, in non-Latino patients Methylobacterium spp. was enriched (LFC: 1.3). The F/B ratio was higher in the Latino group as compared to the non-Latino group (1.00 vs 0.92). We did not observe any differences in alpha and beta diversity. Conclusions Our examination of the gut microbiota of pts with mRCC revealed significant differences based on ethnicity at baseline. Specifically, the Latino group exhibited an enhancement of Roseburia spp. and E. rectale, species previously linked to favorable outcomes with ICIs. Our findings suggest that clinical trials related to the microbiome should potentially account for baseline differences in ethnicity.

The OncologistVol. 29(Supplement_1)
City of Hope (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 89%
Gut microbiota and health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.