Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of U.S. Polypay sheep from breed origins to future genomic selection

Knowledge of past and present genetic diversity within a breed is critical for the design and optimization of breeding programs as well as the development of strategies for the conservation of genetic resources. The Polypay sheep breed was developed at the U.S. Sheep Experiment Station (USSES) in 1968 with the goal of improving productivity in Western U.S. range flocks. It has since flourished in the more intensively managed production systems throughout the U.S. The genetic diversity of the breed has yet to be documented. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the genetic diversity and population structure of U.S. Polypay sheep using both pedigree- and genomic-based methods. Pedigree data from 193 Polypay flocks participating in the National Sheep Improvement Program (NSIP) were combined with pedigree records from USSES (n = 162,997), tracing back to the breed's origin. A subset of these pedigreed sheep from 32 flocks born from 2011 to 2023 were genotyped with the GGP Ovine 50K BeadChip containing 51,867 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Four subgroups were used for the pedigree-based analyses: 1) the current generation of animals born in 2020-2022 (n = 20,701), 2) the current generation with a minimum of four generations of known ancestors (n = 12,685), 3) only genotyped animals (n = 1,856), and 4) the sires of the current generation (n = 509). Pedigree-based inbreeding for the full population was 2.2%, with a rate of inbreeding of 0.22% per generation. Pedigree-based inbreeding, Wright's inbreeding, and genomic inbreeding based on runs of homozygosity were 2.9%, 1.3%, and 5.1%, respectively, for the genotyped population. The effective population size ranged from 41 to 249 for the pedigree-based methods and 118 for the genomic-based estimate. Expected and observed heterozygosity levels were 0.409 and 0.403, respectively. Population substructure was evident based on the fixation index (F<sub>ST</sub>), principal component analysis, and model-based population structure. These analyses provided evidence of differentiation from the foundation flock (USSES). Overall, the Polypay breed exhibited substantial genetic diversity and the presence of a population substructure that provides a basis for the implementation of genomic selection in the breed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Genetics
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2024.1436990
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.20

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of U.S. Polypay sheep from breed origins to future genomic selection

Joshua Bret Taylor, Sara M. Nilson, Ronald M Lewis, Luiz F. Brito et al.
4 citations
Frontiers in Genetics
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
2.20
article

Assessment of genetic diversity and population structure of U.S. Polypay sheep from breed origins to future genomic selection

Joshua Bret Taylor, Sara M. Nilson, Ronald M Lewis, Luiz F. Brito, Thomas W Murphy, B. A. Freking, Jessica L. Petersen, Carrie S Wilson
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Knowledge of past and present genetic diversity within a breed is critical for the design and optimization of breeding programs as well as the development of strategies for the conservation of genetic resources. The Polypay sheep breed was developed at the U.S. Sheep Experiment Station (USSES) in 1968 with the goal of improving productivity in Western U.S. range flocks. It has since flourished in the more intensively managed production systems throughout the U.S. The genetic diversity of the breed has yet to be documented. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive evaluation of the genetic diversity and population structure of U.S. Polypay sheep using both pedigree- and genomic-based methods. Pedigree data from 193 Polypay flocks participating in the National Sheep Improvement Program (NSIP) were combined with pedigree records from USSES (n = 162,997), tracing back to the breed's origin. A subset of these pedigreed sheep from 32 flocks born from 2011 to 2023 were genotyped with the GGP Ovine 50K BeadChip containing 51,867 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Four subgroups were used for the pedigree-based analyses: 1) the current generation of animals born in 2020-2022 (n = 20,701), 2) the current generation with a minimum of four generations of known ancestors (n = 12,685), 3) only genotyped animals (n = 1,856), and 4) the sires of the current generation (n = 509). Pedigree-based inbreeding for the full population was 2.2%, with a rate of inbreeding of 0.22% per generation. Pedigree-based inbreeding, Wright's inbreeding, and genomic inbreeding based on runs of homozygosity were 2.9%, 1.3%, and 5.1%, respectively, for the genotyped population. The effective population size ranged from 41 to 249 for the pedigree-based methods and 118 for the genomic-based estimate. Expected and observed heterozygosity levels were 0.409 and 0.403, respectively. Population substructure was evident based on the fixation index (F<sub>ST</sub>), principal component analysis, and model-based population structure. These analyses provided evidence of differentiation from the foundation flock (USSES). Overall, the Polypay breed exhibited substantial genetic diversity and the presence of a population substructure that provides a basis for the implementation of genomic selection in the breed.

Frontiers in GeneticsVol. 15
University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US), Purdue University West Lafayette (US), Roman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
2.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.