Driving towards sustainability: exploring risk perceptions of fossil fuels, e-fuels, and electric drives in individual transport

The transportation sector is a significant contributor to CO 2 emissions, necessitating the adoption of alternative drive technologies to achieve decarbonization. This study investigates public perceptions of fossil fuels, e-fuels, and electric drives, with the aim of identifying factors influencing risk perceptions, perceived efficacy in combating climate change, and readiness to use or purchase cars with these technologies. Therefore, a quantitative study using a questionnaire (N = 141) was conducted. The results indicate that e-fuels and electric drives are perceived more positively than fossil fuels. E-fuels were found to have the lowest risk perceptions. Differences in cognitive and affective risk perceptions, as well as in financial, environmental, and health-related risks, were observed across drive types. Car affinity was found to correlate negatively with risk perceptions of e-fuels and fossil fuels, but positively with electric drives. The risk perception of global warming showed an inverse relationship. Regarding the prediction of readiness, differences were found between e-fuels and electric drives in terms of the influencing factors on readiness. The study contributes to the understanding of public perceptions by providing a comparison between different drive technologies and offers valuable insights for developing targeted communication strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Energy Research
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1415430
Citations
11
Primary Topic
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.45

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Driving towards sustainability: exploring risk perceptions of fossil fuels, e-fuels, and electric drives in individual transport

Katrin Arning, Eva Rößler, Tim Schmeckel, Ute Kesselheim
11 citations
Frontiers in Energy Research
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
12.45
article

Driving towards sustainability: exploring risk perceptions of fossil fuels, e-fuels, and electric drives in individual transport

Katrin Arning, Eva Rößler, Tim Schmeckel, Ute Kesselheim
article en
11 citations

Abstract

The transportation sector is a significant contributor to CO 2 emissions, necessitating the adoption of alternative drive technologies to achieve decarbonization. This study investigates public perceptions of fossil fuels, e-fuels, and electric drives, with the aim of identifying factors influencing risk perceptions, perceived efficacy in combating climate change, and readiness to use or purchase cars with these technologies. Therefore, a quantitative study using a questionnaire (N = 141) was conducted. The results indicate that e-fuels and electric drives are perceived more positively than fossil fuels. E-fuels were found to have the lowest risk perceptions. Differences in cognitive and affective risk perceptions, as well as in financial, environmental, and health-related risks, were observed across drive types. Car affinity was found to correlate negatively with risk perceptions of e-fuels and fossil fuels, but positively with electric drives. The risk perception of global warming showed an inverse relationship. Regarding the prediction of readiness, differences were found between e-fuels and electric drives in terms of the influencing factors on readiness. The study contributes to the understanding of public perceptions by providing a comparison between different drive technologies and offers valuable insights for developing targeted communication strategies.

Frontiers in Energy ResearchVol. 12
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
12.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.