Unification, T-theoreticity, and Testing: The Case of Fitness in Natural Selection

Abstract Theoreticity and unification are two main issues discussed in philosophy of science. The first attempts to clarify the different roles of concepts used in a scientific theory. The second concerns the role of unification in scientific explanation and scientific progress. Both discussions have followed separate, independent paths. In this paper, we examine the interrelatedness of these two notions by focusing on classical particle mechanics and the theory of natural selection. We claim that they are interconnected in two distinct ways. On the one hand, a theory’s unifying power relies on the presence of some theoretical concepts that apply to heterogeneous phenomena through the assumption of a (sometimes unstated) general principle. On the other hand, a sensible application of the theoreticity criterion to these integrating concepts requires the unification not being spurious. We conclude that a correct determination of the theoreticty status requires analyzing how specific applications of different parts of a theory interact with each other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Erkenntnis
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-024-00826-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.04

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unification, T-theoreticity, and Testing: The Case of Fitness in Natural Selection

José A. Díez, Pablo Lorenzano, Santiago Ginnobili
1 citations
Erkenntnis
Philosophy and History of Science
6.04
article

Unification, T-theoreticity, and Testing: The Case of Fitness in Natural Selection

José A. Díez, Pablo Lorenzano, Santiago Ginnobili
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Theoreticity and unification are two main issues discussed in philosophy of science. The first attempts to clarify the different roles of concepts used in a scientific theory. The second concerns the role of unification in scientific explanation and scientific progress. Both discussions have followed separate, independent paths. In this paper, we examine the interrelatedness of these two notions by focusing on classical particle mechanics and the theory of natural selection. We claim that they are interconnected in two distinct ways. On the one hand, a theory’s unifying power relies on the presence of some theoretical concepts that apply to heterogeneous phenomena through the assumption of a (sometimes unstated) general principle. On the other hand, a sensible application of the theoreticity criterion to these integrating concepts requires the unification not being spurious. We conclude that a correct determination of the theoreticty status requires analyzing how specific applications of different parts of a theory interact with each other.

ErkenntnisVol. 90(7)
National University of Quilmes (AR), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad de Buenos Aires (AR), Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Universidad Nacional de Quilmes, Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo, Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Philosophy and History of Science
6.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.