Genetic variability for salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MILL.) genotypes determined by stress tolerance indices

Tomato is an important vegetable crop; however, salinity hampers its growth and yield-related traits. Different tomato genotypes significantly differ in their salinity tolerance; thus, selecting the tolerant genotypes could improve yield and productivity under saline environments. This study investigated salinity tolerance of five tomato genotypes, i.e., ‘Pakit’, ‘Riogrande’, ‘Roma’, ‘Continental’, and ‘Nagina’ under 0-, 100-, 150- and 200-mM salinity levels. Data relating yield-related traits (plant height, shoot fresh and dry weights, number of fruits per plant, single fruit weight and fruit yield per plant) and nine different stress tolerance indices were employed to infer salinity-tolerance of the genotypes. Increasing salinity levels negatively affected the yield-related traits of genotypes; however, genotypes exhibited varied tolerance to salinity. The better and the poor yield-related traits were noted under 0- and 200-mM salinity levels, respectively. Similarly, genotypes ‘Pakit’ and ‘Nagina’ recorded the highest and the lowest values of yield-related traits. The genotype ‘Pakit’ proved the most tolerant to tested salinity levels compared to the rest of the genotypes. The ‘Pakit’ genotypes had the highest stress tolerance index (0.19, 1.06 and 1.79) and the lowest relative change in yield (6.00, 32.59, and 55.75%) under all salinity levels. Principal component analysis biplot revealed that ‘Pakit’ genotypes had superior yield traits and tolerance indices. The genotype ‘Pakit’ exhibited a higher level of salinity tolerance (6 % yield reduction under 100 mM salinity compared to 27.67 % reduction in ‘Nagina’ genotype. Therefore, genotype ‘Pakit’ can be recommended for cultivation on low to moderate saline soils without significant yield losses. On the other hand, ‘Nagina’ genotype proved the most sensitive to salinity (27.67 %, 56.79 %, and 68.90 % yield reduction under 100-, 150-, and 200-mM salinity, respectively). Therefore, this genotype should not be cultivated on saline soils.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of King Saud University - Science
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2024.103386
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.80

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Genetic variability for salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MILL.) genotypes determined by stress tolerance indices

Jawaher Alkahtani, Bandar M. AlMunqedhi, Ansar Hussain, Yingyu Zhang et al.
3 citations
Journal of King Saud University - Science
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
1.80
article

Genetic variability for salinity tolerance of tomato (Solanum lycopersicon MILL.) genotypes determined by stress tolerance indices

Jawaher Alkahtani, Bandar M. AlMunqedhi, Ansar Hussain, Yingyu Zhang, Muhammad Arif, Song Cheng
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Tomato is an important vegetable crop; however, salinity hampers its growth and yield-related traits. Different tomato genotypes significantly differ in their salinity tolerance; thus, selecting the tolerant genotypes could improve yield and productivity under saline environments. This study investigated salinity tolerance of five tomato genotypes, i.e., ‘Pakit’, ‘Riogrande’, ‘Roma’, ‘Continental’, and ‘Nagina’ under 0-, 100-, 150- and 200-mM salinity levels. Data relating yield-related traits (plant height, shoot fresh and dry weights, number of fruits per plant, single fruit weight and fruit yield per plant) and nine different stress tolerance indices were employed to infer salinity-tolerance of the genotypes. Increasing salinity levels negatively affected the yield-related traits of genotypes; however, genotypes exhibited varied tolerance to salinity. The better and the poor yield-related traits were noted under 0- and 200-mM salinity levels, respectively. Similarly, genotypes ‘Pakit’ and ‘Nagina’ recorded the highest and the lowest values of yield-related traits. The genotype ‘Pakit’ proved the most tolerant to tested salinity levels compared to the rest of the genotypes. The ‘Pakit’ genotypes had the highest stress tolerance index (0.19, 1.06 and 1.79) and the lowest relative change in yield (6.00, 32.59, and 55.75%) under all salinity levels. Principal component analysis biplot revealed that ‘Pakit’ genotypes had superior yield traits and tolerance indices. The genotype ‘Pakit’ exhibited a higher level of salinity tolerance (6 % yield reduction under 100 mM salinity compared to 27.67 % reduction in ‘Nagina’ genotype. Therefore, genotype ‘Pakit’ can be recommended for cultivation on low to moderate saline soils without significant yield losses. On the other hand, ‘Nagina’ genotype proved the most sensitive to salinity (27.67 %, 56.79 %, and 68.90 % yield reduction under 100-, 150-, and 200-mM salinity, respectively). Therefore, this genotype should not be cultivated on saline soils.

Journal of King Saud University - ScienceVol. 36(9)
Sakarya University (TR), King Saud University (SA), Ghazi University (PK), First Affiliated Hospital of Henan University of Science and Technology (CN), West Anhui University (CN), Sakarya Uygulamalı Bilimler Üniversitesi
Anhui Provincial Department of Human Resources and Social Security, King Saud University, Henan University of Science and Technology, Basic Scientific Fund for National Public Research Institutes of China
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Plant Stress Responses and Tolerance
1.80
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.