Developing a methodological framework for consequential life cycle assessment with an illustrative application to plant protein extraction

Consequential Life Cycle Assessment (CLCA) can play an important role in providing insights for decision-makers regarding potential market-mediated resource/environmental consequences stemming from changes in product systems. However, the consistent application of CLCA encounters challenges due to the absence of common guidelines. This systematic review studied different sets of literature to develop a methodological framework for CLCA of plant protein extraction through fractionation, using Canada as an example. Given that economic models are integral components of CLCA, this systematic review offers a comprehensive survey of the economic models employed in 18 CLCA studies, shedding light on their respective strengths and weaknesses. Notably, the study identifies the use of both Computable General Equilibrium and Partial Equilibrium models for enabling the analysis of large-scale and long-term changes. The estimation of land use changes (both direct and indirect) is an integral part and economic models are instrumental in quantifying indirect land use changes. For characterizing the common modelling practices in the agri-food sector, 33 CLCA studies were reviewed to extract information on the decision context, time horizon, identification of marginal/substitutable markets, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, etc. ‘Increased supply’ and ‘increased demand’ are both found to be important decision contexts. It is a common practice to identify marginal markets based on assumptions, literature, and other sources along with employing economic models for some cases. However, economic models in the agri-food studies were used more often for estimating land use change impacts. To elaborate the case study of plant protein extraction (i.e., pea fractionation), some of the alternative uses of the co-products of pea fractionation processes as a basis for determining probable marginal markets were identified. Building upon these findings, the review culminates in the proposal of a detailed methodological framework for CLCA applied to pea fractionation, incorporating considerations of marginal markets that revolve around utilizing co-products like pea starch and pea fibre. Future research could focus on identifying marginal markets relevant to the Canadian landscape, thereby enhancing the applicability and relevance of CLCA within this region.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.07.031
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Developing a methodological framework for consequential life cycle assessment with an illustrative application to plant protein extraction

Pankaj Bhowmik, Nathan Pelletier, Kasun Hewage, Farid Bensebaa et al.
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Developing a methodological framework for consequential life cycle assessment with an illustrative application to plant protein extraction

Pankaj Bhowmik, Nathan Pelletier, Kasun Hewage, Farid Bensebaa, Jannatul Ferdous
article en

Abstract

Consequential Life Cycle Assessment (CLCA) can play an important role in providing insights for decision-makers regarding potential market-mediated resource/environmental consequences stemming from changes in product systems. However, the consistent application of CLCA encounters challenges due to the absence of common guidelines. This systematic review studied different sets of literature to develop a methodological framework for CLCA of plant protein extraction through fractionation, using Canada as an example. Given that economic models are integral components of CLCA, this systematic review offers a comprehensive survey of the economic models employed in 18 CLCA studies, shedding light on their respective strengths and weaknesses. Notably, the study identifies the use of both Computable General Equilibrium and Partial Equilibrium models for enabling the analysis of large-scale and long-term changes. The estimation of land use changes (both direct and indirect) is an integral part and economic models are instrumental in quantifying indirect land use changes. For characterizing the common modelling practices in the agri-food sector, 33 CLCA studies were reviewed to extract information on the decision context, time horizon, identification of marginal/substitutable markets, uncertainty and sensitivity analyses, etc. ‘Increased supply’ and ‘increased demand’ are both found to be important decision contexts. It is a common practice to identify marginal markets based on assumptions, literature, and other sources along with employing economic models for some cases. However, economic models in the agri-food studies were used more often for estimating land use change impacts. To elaborate the case study of plant protein extraction (i.e., pea fractionation), some of the alternative uses of the co-products of pea fractionation processes as a basis for determining probable marginal markets were identified. Building upon these findings, the review culminates in the proposal of a detailed methodological framework for CLCA applied to pea fractionation, incorporating considerations of marginal markets that revolve around utilizing co-products like pea starch and pea fibre. Future research could focus on identifying marginal markets relevant to the Canadian landscape, thereby enhancing the applicability and relevance of CLCA within this region.

Sustainable Production and ConsumptionVol. 50
University of British Columbia (CA), National Research Council Canada (CA), Okanagan University College (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.