<i>The Czech Republic v Poland</i> (<i>Mine de Turów</i>): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive

Abstract An international dispute between the Republic of Poland and Czechia over the Turów mine has recently resulted in infringement proceedings brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. This case and the judicial and extrajudicial processes surrounding it facilitate an assessment of the procedure provided for in Articles 258 to 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The assessment of this procedure is undertaken both in terms of the achievement of the internal policy objectives of the Member State and in terms of the effectiveness of the implementation of European law. We argue that this procedure (under Articles 258–260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) is effective in both connections, because it provides a wide range of opportunities for both the judicial authorities of the European Union and the Member States themselves to achieve their objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12568
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive

Eike Albrecht, Marcin Sobota, Bartosz Jawecki, Katarzyna Tokarczyk‐Dorociak
1 citations
Review of European Comparative & International Environmental Law
European and International Law Studies
2.23
article

The Czech Republic v Poland (Mine de Turów): Politics and implementation of the EU Water Framework Directive

Eike Albrecht, Marcin Sobota, Bartosz Jawecki, Katarzyna Tokarczyk‐Dorociak
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract An international dispute between the Republic of Poland and Czechia over the Turów mine has recently resulted in infringement proceedings brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union concerning the implementation of the Water Framework Directive. This case and the judicial and extrajudicial processes surrounding it facilitate an assessment of the procedure provided for in Articles 258 to 260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The assessment of this procedure is undertaken both in terms of the achievement of the internal policy objectives of the Member State and in terms of the effectiveness of the implementation of European law. We argue that this procedure (under Articles 258–260 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union) is effective in both connections, because it provides a wide range of opportunities for both the judicial authorities of the European Union and the Member States themselves to achieve their objectives.

Review of European Comparative & International Environmental LawVol. 33(3)
Wrocław University of Environmental and Life Sciences (PL), Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg (DE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
European and International Law Studies
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.