Pragmatic Competence in an Email Writing Task: Influences of Situation, L1 Background, and L2 Proficiency

The study examines a corpus of 306 request emails written by 32 English-speaking (ES) teachers and 121 L2 learners from distinctive L1 backgrounds (i.e., Chinese, French, Spanish) and with different levels of L2 proficiency. Pragmatic competence is analyzed through the coding of direct and indirect request strategies used in formal and informal email writing. Findings reveal the influences of communicative situation, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on pragmatic competence in email writing. First, L2 learners show a significantly lower degree of situational variability compared with ES teachers. Second, L1 backgrounds have a significant impact on L2 writing performance. Third, L2 learners with higher English proficiency tend to use more indirect request strategies, but they have not developed pragmatic competence to adjust their usage across written contexts. Findings are discussed in relation to pedagogical implications for developing writing competence of L2 learners, which should be attuned to diverse rhetorical expectations and individual needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Written Communication
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883241263543
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
27.36
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pragmatic Competence in an Email Writing Task: Influences of Situation, L1 Background, and L2 Proficiency

Wei Ren, Wenjuan Qin, Roujia Jia
7 citations
Written Communication
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
27.36
article

Pragmatic Competence in an Email Writing Task: Influences of Situation, L1 Background, and L2 Proficiency

Wei Ren, Wenjuan Qin, Roujia Jia
article en
7 citations

Abstract

The study examines a corpus of 306 request emails written by 32 English-speaking (ES) teachers and 121 L2 learners from distinctive L1 backgrounds (i.e., Chinese, French, Spanish) and with different levels of L2 proficiency. Pragmatic competence is analyzed through the coding of direct and indirect request strategies used in formal and informal email writing. Findings reveal the influences of communicative situation, L1 background, and L2 proficiency on pragmatic competence in email writing. First, L2 learners show a significantly lower degree of situational variability compared with ES teachers. Second, L1 backgrounds have a significant impact on L2 writing performance. Third, L2 learners with higher English proficiency tend to use more indirect request strategies, but they have not developed pragmatic competence to adjust their usage across written contexts. Findings are discussed in relation to pedagogical implications for developing writing competence of L2 learners, which should be attuned to diverse rhetorical expectations and individual needs.

Written CommunicationVol. 41(4)
University of Cambridge (GB), Fudan University (CN), Beihang University (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
27.36
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.