Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought

Abstract This article presents Latinx political thought as a distinctive tradition in political theory that reworks central concepts in response to historical experiences of conquest, colonialism, migration, and transnational politics. In reconstructing this tradition, we argue that its problem space converges with US-based Latin American political thought. The article first traces a genealogy of Latinx political theory and then explores three realms of theorizing around which Latinx and Latin American political thought cluster: sovereignty and state violence, peoplehood, and transnationalism. We explain how the surveyed works disrupt and enrich political theory accounts of these problems. In arguing for the recognition of this field as a tradition, the article also aims to make it intelligible as an area of concentration for PhD students in political science.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Political Science Review
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000534
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Political Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought

Arturo Chang, Raymond Rocco, Inés Valdez
5 citations
American Political Science Review
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.92
article

Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought

Arturo Chang, Raymond Rocco, Inés Valdez
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article presents Latinx political thought as a distinctive tradition in political theory that reworks central concepts in response to historical experiences of conquest, colonialism, migration, and transnational politics. In reconstructing this tradition, we argue that its problem space converges with US-based Latin American political thought. The article first traces a genealogy of Latinx political theory and then explores three realms of theorizing around which Latinx and Latin American political thought cluster: sovereignty and state violence, peoplehood, and transnationalism. We explain how the surveyed works disrupt and enrich political theory accounts of these problems. In arguing for the recognition of this field as a tradition, the article also aims to make it intelligible as an area of concentration for PhD students in political science.

American Political Science ReviewVol. 119(2)
Johns Hopkins University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), University of Toronto (CA)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Political Philosophy and Ethics
8.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Tradition and Disruption in Latinx and Latin American Political Thought — Arturo Chang, Raymond Rocco, et al. · American Political Science Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS