Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate

Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an [Formula: see text] separating turbulent flow using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and URANS-enriched local piston theory (LPT). Structural modeling assumptions are also evaluated using both linear and nonlinear representations. Close agreement in the predicted aeroelastic steady state is observed. However, large discrepancies in the dynamic aeroelastic response predictions are found and ultimately linked to the neglect of deformation-induced cavity pressure fluctuations and dynamic flow separation in the LPT model. Interestingly, the dynamic flow separation induces a fluid-driven limit cycle oscillation in the postflutter regime. Furthermore, structural nonlinearity is not found to have a strong impact on the conditions and configurations considered.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AIAA Journal
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2514/1.j063758
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.50

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate

Jack J. McNamara, Jordan D. Thayer
4 citations
AIAA Journal
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
1.50
article

Effect of Model Fidelity on High-Speed Aeroelastic Behavior of a Cantilever Plate

Jack J. McNamara, Jordan D. Thayer
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Turbulence, flow separation, and shock dynamics challenge the modeling and analysis of high-speed aeroelastic behavior. Motivated by this, the importance of modeling the fidelity of the flow is explored in the aeroelastic response of a cantilever plate in an [Formula: see text] separating turbulent flow using unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) and URANS-enriched local piston theory (LPT). Structural modeling assumptions are also evaluated using both linear and nonlinear representations. Close agreement in the predicted aeroelastic steady state is observed. However, large discrepancies in the dynamic aeroelastic response predictions are found and ultimately linked to the neglect of deformation-induced cavity pressure fluctuations and dynamic flow separation in the LPT model. Interestingly, the dynamic flow separation induces a fluid-driven limit cycle oscillation in the postflutter regime. Furthermore, structural nonlinearity is not found to have a strong impact on the conditions and configurations considered.

AIAA JournalVol. 62(10)
The Ohio State University (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, Graduate School, Ohio State University
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Fluid Dynamics and Vibration Analysis
1.50
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.