Bank Regulation/Supervision and Bank Auditing

We investigate how bank regulation and supervision influence banks' internal control quality, banks' financial statement reliability, and the effort expended by bank auditors. Using material weaknesses in internal controls disclosed under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as the proxy for internal control quality, we find that banks exhibit significantly higher internal control quality than comparable nonbank financial firms. Using restatements of financial statements as the proxy for financial statement reliability, we find that banks' financial reports are more reliable than those of comparable nonbanks. Using audit fees as the proxy for audit effort, we find that auditors expend less effort in audits of banks than in audits of comparable nonbanks. Collectively, our findings suggest that the combination of bank audits and banking regulation/supervision significantly improves banks' internal control quality and financial statement reliability, despite auditors expending less effort in bank audits compared to nonbanks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Accounting Review
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2024.2373207
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bank Regulation/Supervision and Bank Auditing

Stephen G. Ryan, Henry Jarva, Al Ghosh
7 citations
European Accounting Review
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
5.68
article

Bank Regulation/Supervision and Bank Auditing

Stephen G. Ryan, Henry Jarva, Al Ghosh
article en
7 citations

Abstract

We investigate how bank regulation and supervision influence banks' internal control quality, banks' financial statement reliability, and the effort expended by bank auditors. Using material weaknesses in internal controls disclosed under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as the proxy for internal control quality, we find that banks exhibit significantly higher internal control quality than comparable nonbank financial firms. Using restatements of financial statements as the proxy for financial statement reliability, we find that banks' financial reports are more reliable than those of comparable nonbanks. Using audit fees as the proxy for audit effort, we find that auditors expend less effort in audits of banks than in audits of comparable nonbanks. Collectively, our findings suggest that the combination of bank audits and banking regulation/supervision significantly improves banks' internal control quality and financial statement reliability, despite auditors expending less effort in bank audits compared to nonbanks.

European Accounting ReviewVol. 34(4)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Hanken School of Economics (FI), New York University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
5.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bank Regulation/Supervision and Bank Auditing — Stephen G. Ryan, Henry Jarva, et al. · European Accounting Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS