Organizing Integration of Refugees: Translation and Hybridization

Abstract How is integration organized in practice, and what role do hybrids play in such practices? Based on fieldwork on two integration support initiatives for recent refugees in one of Sweden’s largest cities, this paper critically engages these questions, focusing in particular on integration as a multi-directional, ambiguous process that is shaped by the intervention of a great many agents. In line with previous research, we conclude that practices of integration require collaboration between many humans and non-humans, while at the same time we question many of the assumptions about who should collaborate with whom and who should receive support if the integration is to succeed. We also discovered that “integration” is a kind of boundary word, which is translated differently by different actors, but nevertheless facilitates various forms of collaboration and coordination. Some see it as a step toward assimilation, others as a step toward hybridization. If, as is claimed by many scholars, hybridization is an unavoidable result of modernization, it will most likely prevail.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Organizational Sociology
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/joso-2024-0012
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizing Integration of Refugees: Translation and Hybridization

Andreas Diedrich, Barbara Czarniawska
3 citations
Journal of Organizational Sociology
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
3.40
article

Organizing Integration of Refugees: Translation and Hybridization

Andreas Diedrich, Barbara Czarniawska
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract How is integration organized in practice, and what role do hybrids play in such practices? Based on fieldwork on two integration support initiatives for recent refugees in one of Sweden’s largest cities, this paper critically engages these questions, focusing in particular on integration as a multi-directional, ambiguous process that is shaped by the intervention of a great many agents. In line with previous research, we conclude that practices of integration require collaboration between many humans and non-humans, while at the same time we question many of the assumptions about who should collaborate with whom and who should receive support if the integration is to succeed. We also discovered that “integration” is a kind of boundary word, which is translated differently by different actors, but nevertheless facilitates various forms of collaboration and coordination. Some see it as a step toward assimilation, others as a step toward hybridization. If, as is claimed by many scholars, hybridization is an unavoidable result of modernization, it will most likely prevail.

Journal of Organizational SociologyVol. 2(3)
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Migration, Refugees, and Integration
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Organizing Integration of Refugees: Translation and Hybridization — Andreas Diedrich, Barbara Czarniawska · Journal of Organizational Sociology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS