Generalisation to novel exemplars of learned shape categories based on visual and auditory spatial cues does not benefit from multisensory information

Although the integration of information across multiple senses can enhance object representations in memory, how multisensory information affects the formation of categories is uncertain. In particular, it is unclear to what extent categories formed from multisensory information benefit object recognition over unisensory inputs. Two experiments investigated the categorisation of novel auditory and visual objects, with categories defined by spatial similarity, and tested generalisation to novel exemplars. Participants learned to categorise exemplars based on visual-only (geometric shape), auditory-only (spatially defined soundscape) or audio-visual spatial cues. Categorisation to learned as well as novel exemplars was then tested under the same sensory learning conditions. For all learning modalities, categorisation generalised to novel exemplars. However, there was no evidence of enhanced categorisation performance for learned multisensory exemplars. At best, bimodal performance approximated that of the most accurate unimodal condition, although this was observed only for a subset of exemplars within a category. These findings provide insight into the perceptual processes involved in the formation of categories and have relevance for understanding the sensory nature of object representations underpinning these categories.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-024-02548-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Generalisation to novel exemplars of learned shape categories based on visual and auditory spatial cues does not benefit from multisensory information

Fiona N. Newell, R. J. Hirst, Alan O’Dowd, Martina Andrea Seveso et al.
2 citations
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Multisensory perception and integration
1.02
article

Generalisation to novel exemplars of learned shape categories based on visual and auditory spatial cues does not benefit from multisensory information

Fiona N. Newell, R. J. Hirst, Alan O’Dowd, Martina Andrea Seveso, Erin McKenna
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Although the integration of information across multiple senses can enhance object representations in memory, how multisensory information affects the formation of categories is uncertain. In particular, it is unclear to what extent categories formed from multisensory information benefit object recognition over unisensory inputs. Two experiments investigated the categorisation of novel auditory and visual objects, with categories defined by spatial similarity, and tested generalisation to novel exemplars. Participants learned to categorise exemplars based on visual-only (geometric shape), auditory-only (spatially defined soundscape) or audio-visual spatial cues. Categorisation to learned as well as novel exemplars was then tested under the same sensory learning conditions. For all learning modalities, categorisation generalised to novel exemplars. However, there was no evidence of enhanced categorisation performance for learned multisensory exemplars. At best, bimodal performance approximated that of the most accurate unimodal condition, although this was observed only for a subset of exemplars within a category. These findings provide insight into the perceptual processes involved in the formation of categories and have relevance for understanding the sensory nature of object representations underpinning these categories.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 32(1)
New York University Abu Dhabi (AE), Trinity College Dublin (IE)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Multisensory perception and integration
1.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.