How quotation marks do mockery in online politicized discourse

Abstract This article analyzes online comments responding to viral sociopolitical events in different languages, across different social media platforms. We use discourse analytic methods to inspect how quotation marks are systematically deployed to intensify denigrations of opposing political identities and positions in the context of political disagreements. We show how quotation marks are used in situated online interactions to convey a skeptical, derisive stance toward quoted content while positioning one’s reasonable perspective against an unreasonable, illegitimate other. This online discursive practice provides insights into how ordinary politics are engaged (or rather, not seriously engaged) when people participate in mockery in disputative online discourse.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Language and Politics
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/jlp.22008.rob
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How quotation marks do mockery in online politicized discourse

Bingjuan Xiong, Jessica S. Robles
1 citations
Journal of Language and Politics
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
2.78
article

How quotation marks do mockery in online politicized discourse

Bingjuan Xiong, Jessica S. Robles
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes online comments responding to viral sociopolitical events in different languages, across different social media platforms. We use discourse analytic methods to inspect how quotation marks are systematically deployed to intensify denigrations of opposing political identities and positions in the context of political disagreements. We show how quotation marks are used in situated online interactions to convey a skeptical, derisive stance toward quoted content while positioning one’s reasonable perspective against an unreasonable, illegitimate other. This online discursive practice provides insights into how ordinary politics are engaged (or rather, not seriously engaged) when people participate in mockery in disputative online discourse.

Journal of Language and Politics
Loughborough University (GB), University of Auckland (NZ)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.