Deterministic Impartial Selection with Weights

In the impartial selection problem, a subset of agents up to a fixed size k among a group of n is to be chosen based on votes cast by the agents themselves. A selection mechanism is impartial if no agent can influence its own chance of being selected by changing its vote. It is α-optimal if, for every instance, the ratio between the votes received by the selected subset is at least a fraction of α of the votes received by the subset of size k with the highest number of votes. We study deterministic impartial mechanisms in a more general setting with arbitrarily weighted votes and provide the first approximation guarantee, roughly 1/⌈ 2 n/k ⌉. When the number of agents to select is large enough compared to the total number of agents, this yields an improvement on the previously best-known approximation ratio of 1/ k for the unweighted setting. We further show that our mechanism can be adapted to the impartial assignment problem, in which multiple sets of up to k agents are to be selected, with a loss in the approximation ratio of 1/2.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3677177
Primary Topic
Game Theory and Voting Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Deterministic Impartial Selection with Weights

Javier Cembrano, Svenja M. Griesbach, Maximilian Stahlberg
1 links
ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation
Game Theory and Voting Systems
article

Deterministic Impartial Selection with Weights

Javier Cembrano, Svenja M. Griesbach, Maximilian Stahlberg
article en

Abstract

In the impartial selection problem, a subset of agents up to a fixed size k among a group of n is to be chosen based on votes cast by the agents themselves. A selection mechanism is impartial if no agent can influence its own chance of being selected by changing its vote. It is α-optimal if, for every instance, the ratio between the votes received by the selected subset is at least a fraction of α of the votes received by the subset of size k with the highest number of votes. We study deterministic impartial mechanisms in a more general setting with arbitrarily weighted votes and provide the first approximation guarantee, roughly 1/⌈ 2 n/k ⌉. When the number of agents to select is large enough compared to the total number of agents, this yields an improvement on the previously best-known approximation ratio of 1/ k for the unweighted setting. We further show that our mechanism can be adapted to the impartial assignment problem, in which multiple sets of up to k agents are to be selected, with a loss in the approximation ratio of 1/2.

ACM Transactions on Economics and ComputationVol. 12(3)
Technische Universität Berlin (DE), Hamburg University of Technology (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Game Theory and Voting Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.