Collaborative Inhibition: A Phenomenological Perspective

Abstract The tendency for people to remember less as members of a group than they would be capable of were they to remember alone is a phenomenon known as collaborative inhibition . The article offers a phenomenological account of this highly counterintuitive effect of group remembering. It argues that the mutual failure to live up to one’s potential does not warrant the standard, strongly negative views about the role of others in recall. Rather, the phenomenon may imply that sharedness itself becomes constitutive of the process in the sense that interaction partners co-determine what and how to remember. Drawing on phenomenological approaches to remembering and second-person engagement, the article argues that individuals participating in shared remembering co-construct their memories by reciprocally and dynamically incorporating each other’s perspectives, attitudes, and emotions about their shared past.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00748-7
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Collaborative Inhibition: A Phenomenological Perspective

Daniel Gyollai
2 citations
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Identity, Memory, and Therapy
1.58
article

Collaborative Inhibition: A Phenomenological Perspective

Daniel Gyollai
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract The tendency for people to remember less as members of a group than they would be capable of were they to remember alone is a phenomenon known as collaborative inhibition . The article offers a phenomenological account of this highly counterintuitive effect of group remembering. It argues that the mutual failure to live up to one’s potential does not warrant the standard, strongly negative views about the role of others in recall. Rather, the phenomenon may imply that sharedness itself becomes constitutive of the process in the sense that interaction partners co-determine what and how to remember. Drawing on phenomenological approaches to remembering and second-person engagement, the article argues that individuals participating in shared remembering co-construct their memories by reciprocally and dynamically incorporating each other’s perspectives, attitudes, and emotions about their shared past.

Review of Philosophy and PsychologyVol. 16(2)
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Københavns Universitet
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Identity, Memory, and Therapy
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.