Comparison of cation and anion‐mediated resolution enhancement of bioprinted hydrogels for membranous tissue fabrication

Fabrication of engineered thin membranous tissues (TMTs) presents a significant challenge to researchers, as these structures are small in scale, but present complex anatomies containing multiple stratified cell layers. While numerous methodologies exist to fabricate such tissues, many are limited by poor mechanical properties, need for post-fabrication, or lack of cytocompatibility. Extrusion bioprinting can address these issues, but lacks the resolution necessary to generate biomimetic, microscale TMT structures. Therefore, our goal was to develop a strategy that enhances bioprinting resolution below its traditional limit of 150 μm and delivers a viable cell population. We have generated a system to effectively shrink printed gels via electrostatic interactions between anionic and cationic polymers. Base hydrogels are composed of gelatin methacrylate type A (cationic), or B (anionic) treated with anionic alginate, and cationic poly-L-lysine, respectively. Through a complex coacervation-like mechanism, the charges attract, causing compaction of the base GelMA network, leading to reduced sample dimensions. In this work, we evaluate the role of both base hydrogel and shrinking polymer charge on effective print resolution and cell viability. The alginate anion-mediated system demonstrated the ability to reach bioprinting resolutions of 70 μm, while maintaining a viable cell population. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has produced such significant enhancement in extrusion bioprinting capabilities, while also remaining cytocompatible.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.a.37783
Citations
1
Primary Topic
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of cation and anion‐mediated resolution enhancement of bioprinted hydrogels for membranous tissue fabrication

Shannon T. McLoughlin, Jonathan Fisher, John F. Caccamese, Sarang Han et al.
1 citations
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.18
article

Comparison of cation and anion‐mediated resolution enhancement of bioprinted hydrogels for membranous tissue fabrication

Shannon T. McLoughlin, Jonathan Fisher, John F. Caccamese, Sarang Han, Paige Wilcox
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Fabrication of engineered thin membranous tissues (TMTs) presents a significant challenge to researchers, as these structures are small in scale, but present complex anatomies containing multiple stratified cell layers. While numerous methodologies exist to fabricate such tissues, many are limited by poor mechanical properties, need for post-fabrication, or lack of cytocompatibility. Extrusion bioprinting can address these issues, but lacks the resolution necessary to generate biomimetic, microscale TMT structures. Therefore, our goal was to develop a strategy that enhances bioprinting resolution below its traditional limit of 150 μm and delivers a viable cell population. We have generated a system to effectively shrink printed gels via electrostatic interactions between anionic and cationic polymers. Base hydrogels are composed of gelatin methacrylate type A (cationic), or B (anionic) treated with anionic alginate, and cationic poly-L-lysine, respectively. Through a complex coacervation-like mechanism, the charges attract, causing compaction of the base GelMA network, leading to reduced sample dimensions. In this work, we evaluate the role of both base hydrogel and shrinking polymer charge on effective print resolution and cell viability. The alginate anion-mediated system demonstrated the ability to reach bioprinting resolutions of 70 μm, while maintaining a viable cell population. To our knowledge, this is the first study that has produced such significant enhancement in extrusion bioprinting capabilities, while also remaining cytocompatible.

Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part AVol. 112(12)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
University of Maryland, Osteo Science Foundation, Geistlich Pharma
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
3D Printing in Biomedical Research
0.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.