Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence

Workers have often advocated for regulation to protect themselves from labor market threats. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to transform many jobs in the coming years, especially those of white collar professionals. Yet we know little about the attitudes these and other workers hold or may develop toward the regulation of such technology. We argue that both self-interested and sociotropic concerns likely shape AI regulatory attitudes, and examine these arguments using a survey experiment exposing individuals to information about how technology will affect the work of people engaged in either routine, repetitive tasks or white collar, cognitive tasks. We anticipate that compared to a placebo group, individuals exposed to news about the impact of technology on jobs will favor regulation, and even more strongly when it is their own job type highlighted in the treatment. We find only modest responsiveness to the treatments on average, but observe that individuals with more knowledge of technology are strongly responsive to the AI treatments in the hypothesized manner.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Information Technology & Politics
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2024.2370815
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.92
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence

Christopher Witko, Tobias Heinrich
7 citations
Journal of Information Technology & Politics
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
7.92
article

Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence

Christopher Witko, Tobias Heinrich
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Workers have often advocated for regulation to protect themselves from labor market threats. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to transform many jobs in the coming years, especially those of white collar professionals. Yet we know little about the attitudes these and other workers hold or may develop toward the regulation of such technology. We argue that both self-interested and sociotropic concerns likely shape AI regulatory attitudes, and examine these arguments using a survey experiment exposing individuals to information about how technology will affect the work of people engaged in either routine, repetitive tasks or white collar, cognitive tasks. We anticipate that compared to a placebo group, individuals exposed to news about the impact of technology on jobs will favor regulation, and even more strongly when it is their own job type highlighted in the treatment. We find only modest responsiveness to the treatments on average, but observe that individuals with more knowledge of technology are strongly responsive to the AI treatments in the hypothesized manner.

Journal of Information Technology & PoliticsVol. 22(3)
Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
7.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Self-interest and preferences for the regulation of artificial intelligence — Christopher Witko, Tobias Heinrich · Journal of Information Technology & Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS