World War II and Socialist Integration: In Search of the Theoretical Foundations for Building the Socialist Bloc (1940–64)

Abstract This article presents the development of ideas on coordination between countries with socialist economic systems during World War II and in its immediate aftermath (1940–64). It studies the theoretical models of Hoselitz and the debates on the possibilities of interaction between socialist states after the war, as well as the first attempts to develop integration within the framework of the CMEA, or the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance, in practice. The lack of a clear theory made these processes difficult. Yugoslav economists considered nonequivalent exchange within the Marxist paradigm and attempts to create a monetary zone of the ruble encountered difficulties from the outset. Monetary reforms in socialist countries showed the need to adapt to the world (capitalist) market.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Economy
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-11470263
Primary Topic
European history and politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

World War II and Socialist Integration: In Search of the Theoretical Foundations for Building the Socialist Bloc (1940–64)

Nikolay Nenovsky, Цветелина Маринова
History of Political Economy
European history and politics
article

World War II and Socialist Integration: In Search of the Theoretical Foundations for Building the Socialist Bloc (1940–64)

Nikolay Nenovsky, Цветелина Маринова
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article presents the development of ideas on coordination between countries with socialist economic systems during World War II and in its immediate aftermath (1940–64). It studies the theoretical models of Hoselitz and the debates on the possibilities of interaction between socialist states after the war, as well as the first attempts to develop integration within the framework of the CMEA, or the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance, in practice. The lack of a clear theory made these processes difficult. Yugoslav economists considered nonequivalent exchange within the Marxist paradigm and attempts to create a monetary zone of the ruble encountered difficulties from the outset. Monetary reforms in socialist countries showed the need to adapt to the world (capitalist) market.

History of Political EconomyVol. 56(S1)
New Bulgarian University (BG), Laboratoire d'Economie, Finance, Management et Innovation (FR), Université de Picardie Jules Verne (FR)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
European history and politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

World War II and Socialist Integration: In Search of the Theoretical Foundations for Building the Socialist Bloc (1940–64) — Nikolay Nenovsky, Цветелина Маринова · History of Political Economy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS