Analysis without Theory: How the Statistical Research Group Shaped Milton Friedman's Economic Methodology

Abstract This article shows that Friedman's experiences with the research conducted at the Statistical Research Group (SRG) significantly shaped his 1953 methodology. These experiences gave him the ideas for a methodology for statistical analysis when dealing with “lousy data,” that is, when the conditions under which they are generated are not clear, when the data are “uncontrolled experiences.” Two views emerged from his SRG work. One is his view on theoretical assumptions: they only specify and do not determine under which conditions a model or device is expected to work. The other is his view on testing: the working of a device should be tested in comparison with a standard. Assessing the performance of a model with a benchmark model makes irrelevant the uncontrollable, only partly known, complex mass of circumstances under which both models perform. So both views were two sides of the same coin.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of Political Economy
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00182702-11470295
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Economic Theory and Institutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis without Theory: How the Statistical Research Group Shaped Milton Friedman's Economic Methodology

Marcel Boumans
1 citations
History of Political Economy
Economic Theory and Institutions
1.13
article

Analysis without Theory: How the Statistical Research Group Shaped Milton Friedman's Economic Methodology

Marcel Boumans
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This article shows that Friedman's experiences with the research conducted at the Statistical Research Group (SRG) significantly shaped his 1953 methodology. These experiences gave him the ideas for a methodology for statistical analysis when dealing with “lousy data,” that is, when the conditions under which they are generated are not clear, when the data are “uncontrolled experiences.” Two views emerged from his SRG work. One is his view on theoretical assumptions: they only specify and do not determine under which conditions a model or device is expected to work. The other is his view on testing: the working of a device should be tested in comparison with a standard. Assessing the performance of a model with a benchmark model makes irrelevant the uncontrollable, only partly known, complex mass of circumstances under which both models perform. So both views were two sides of the same coin.

History of Political EconomyVol. 56(S1)
Utrecht University (NL)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Economic Theory and Institutions
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Analysis without Theory: How the Statistical Research Group Shaped Milton Friedman's Economic Methodology — Marcel Boumans · History of Political Economy (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS