Practical guidelines for Bayesian phylogenetic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

<ns3:p>Phylogenetic estimation is, and has always been, a complex endeavor. Estimating a phylogenetic tree involves evaluating many possible solutions and possible evolutionary histories that could explain a set of observed data, typically by using a model of evolution. Values for all model parameters need to be evaluated as well. Modern statistical methods involve not just the estimation of a tree, but also solutions to more complex models involving fossil record information and other data sources. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is a leading method for approximating the posterior distribution of parameters in a mathematical model. It is deployed in all Bayesian phylogenetic tree estimation software. While many researchers use MCMC in phylogenetic analyses, interpreting results and diagnosing problems with MCMC remain vexing issues to many biologists. In this manuscript, we will offer an overview of how MCMC is used in Bayesian phylogenetic inference, with a particular emphasis on complex hierarchical models, such as the fossilized birth-death (FBD) model. We will discuss strategies to diagnose common MCMC problems and troubleshoot difficult analyses, in particular convergence issues. We will show how the study design, the choice of models and priors, but also technical features of the inference tools themselves can all be adjusted to obtain the best results. Finally, we will also discuss the unique challenges created by the incorporation of fossil information in phylogenetic inference, and present tips to address them.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Research Europe
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.16679.3
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.94

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Practical guidelines for Bayesian phylogenetic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

Rachel C. M. Warnock, Chi Zhang, April Marie Wright, Joëlle Barido‐Sottani et al.
5 citations
Open Research Europe
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
7.94
article

Practical guidelines for Bayesian phylogenetic inference using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC)

Rachel C. M. Warnock, Chi Zhang, April Marie Wright, Joëlle Barido‐Sottani, Orlando Schwery
article en
5 citations

Abstract

<ns3:p>Phylogenetic estimation is, and has always been, a complex endeavor. Estimating a phylogenetic tree involves evaluating many possible solutions and possible evolutionary histories that could explain a set of observed data, typically by using a model of evolution. Values for all model parameters need to be evaluated as well. Modern statistical methods involve not just the estimation of a tree, but also solutions to more complex models involving fossil record information and other data sources. Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) is a leading method for approximating the posterior distribution of parameters in a mathematical model. It is deployed in all Bayesian phylogenetic tree estimation software. While many researchers use MCMC in phylogenetic analyses, interpreting results and diagnosing problems with MCMC remain vexing issues to many biologists. In this manuscript, we will offer an overview of how MCMC is used in Bayesian phylogenetic inference, with a particular emphasis on complex hierarchical models, such as the fossilized birth-death (FBD) model. We will discuss strategies to diagnose common MCMC problems and troubleshoot difficult analyses, in particular convergence issues. We will show how the study design, the choice of models and priors, but also technical features of the inference tools themselves can all be adjusted to obtain the best results. Finally, we will also discuss the unique challenges created by the incorporation of fossil information in phylogenetic inference, and present tips to address them.</ns3:p>

Open Research EuropeVol. 3
Louisiana State University (US), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Inserm (FR), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE), Southeastern Louisiana University (US), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), École Normale Supérieure - PSL (FR), Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (CN), Institut de Biologie de l'École Normale Supérieure (FR), Virginia Tech (US)
National Science Foundation, Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung, National Natural Science Foundation of China, Horizon 2020 Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
7.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.