A corpus-based study of subtitling religious swear words from English into Arabic

Abstract Subtitling Hollywood films with religious taboo words for conservative and closed societies, such as an Arab society, is a difficult task. This study investigates the dominant religious terms and functions used in Hollywood films and to identify the dominant translation strategies used for them in Arabic subtitles and determines whether these strategies are source language-oriented or target language-oriented (domesticating or foreignising). A corpus of 90 Hollywood films released between 2000 and 2018 is used to answer these questions; insights from descriptive translation studies are also taken ( Toury, 2012 ). The corpus is analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using a self-designed, parallel and aligned corpus of 90 films and their Arabic subtitles. Findings reveal that the functions of religious taboo words have significant impacts on the choices of subtitling strategies. Foreignization strategies are used in roughly two-thirds of all occurrences of religious taboo words despite the cultural distance between English and Arabic. Using Modern Standard Arabic in Arabic subtitles limits subtitlers’ linguistic options. Furthermore, the nature of audio-visual translation influences subtitler choices because the meaning of a word can appear on the screen as a gesture, image or sound.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/forum.23027.sah
Primary Topic
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A corpus-based study of subtitling religious swear words from English into Arabic

Ibrahim Alasmri, Eisa Asiri, Mutahar Qassem, Yousef Sahari et al.
FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and Translation
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
article

A corpus-based study of subtitling religious swear words from English into Arabic

Ibrahim Alasmri, Eisa Asiri, Mutahar Qassem, Yousef Sahari, Ahmad Assiri
article en

Abstract

Abstract Subtitling Hollywood films with religious taboo words for conservative and closed societies, such as an Arab society, is a difficult task. This study investigates the dominant religious terms and functions used in Hollywood films and to identify the dominant translation strategies used for them in Arabic subtitles and determines whether these strategies are source language-oriented or target language-oriented (domesticating or foreignising). A corpus of 90 Hollywood films released between 2000 and 2018 is used to answer these questions; insights from descriptive translation studies are also taken ( Toury, 2012 ). The corpus is analysed quantitatively and qualitatively using a self-designed, parallel and aligned corpus of 90 films and their Arabic subtitles. Findings reveal that the functions of religious taboo words have significant impacts on the choices of subtitling strategies. Foreignization strategies are used in roughly two-thirds of all occurrences of religious taboo words despite the cultural distance between English and Arabic. Using Modern Standard Arabic in Arabic subtitles limits subtitlers’ linguistic options. Furthermore, the nature of audio-visual translation influences subtitler choices because the meaning of a word can appear on the screen as a gesture, image or sound.

FORUM Revue internationale d’interprétation et de traduction / International Journal of Interpretation and TranslationVol. 22(2)
King Abdulaziz University (SA), University of Bisha (SA), Najran University (SA), King Khalid University (SA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Swearing, Euphemism, Multilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.