Framing interactivity in complex communication of debate talk show

Abstract The present study explores how disagreement space is managed in a multiparty argumentative activity of debate talk show that focuses on the political situation in Belarus. The communicative activity under study is viewed as a type of difficult conversation that takes place between two groups that differ in their ideologies ( Ellis 2020 ). In particular, drawing on the polylogical framework of argumentation ( Lewiński and Aakhus 2023 ) and communication design approach ( Aakhus 2007 ), the study investigates the communicative practice of framing that the moderators and the debaters use to shape disagreement space. The analysis shows that the activity is polylogical not just in a sense of positions, participants, and places ( Lewiński and Aakhus 2023 ), but also in how argumentative activity is framed, which has consequences for how the interactivity is constructed and how disagreement space is managed in the course of interaction. It also shows how the interweaving of negative and positive features of communication add to the complexity of difficult interaction.