Unmaking-with AI: Tactics for Decentering through Design

This article explores the intersections and resonances between unmaking and more-than-human design. We begin by aligning unmaking with decentering, a fundamental practice in more-than-human design, through their shared movement and materiality. Using Lindström and Ståhl’s notion of the double movement in un/making, we analyze a series of workshops focused on designing with AI, annotating what was un/made and de/centered during the workshops’ activities. Through this analysis, we introduce two key contributions that highlight some opportunities in the diffractive alignment between unmaking and more-than-human design: firstly, the notion of “unmaking-with” as an emergent concept to describe a posthumanist unmaking practice, and secondly, three decentering tactics—situating, materializing, and enacting—that instantiate this practice through design. Finally, we discuss how unmaking can enrich more-than-human design and, conversely, how more-than-human design can help define the epistemological scope of unmaking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3685275
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.86
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmaking-with AI: Tactics for Decentering through Design

Iohanna Nicenboim, Anuradha Reddy, Joseph Lindley, Johan Redström et al.
5 citations
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.86
article

Unmaking-with AI: Tactics for Decentering through Design

Iohanna Nicenboim, Anuradha Reddy, Joseph Lindley, Johan Redström, Marie Louise Juul Søndergaard, Yolande Strengers, Elisa Giaccardi
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This article explores the intersections and resonances between unmaking and more-than-human design. We begin by aligning unmaking with decentering, a fundamental practice in more-than-human design, through their shared movement and materiality. Using Lindström and Ståhl’s notion of the double movement in un/making, we analyze a series of workshops focused on designing with AI, annotating what was un/made and de/centered during the workshops’ activities. Through this analysis, we introduce two key contributions that highlight some opportunities in the diffractive alignment between unmaking and more-than-human design: firstly, the notion of “unmaking-with” as an emergent concept to describe a posthumanist unmaking practice, and secondly, three decentering tactics—situating, materializing, and enacting—that instantiate this practice through design. Finally, we discuss how unmaking can enrich more-than-human design and, conversely, how more-than-human design can help define the epistemological scope of unmaking.

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human InteractionVol. 31(6)
Oslo School of Architecture and Design (NO), Malmö University (SE), Monash University (AU), Lancaster University (GB), Umeå University (SE), Politecnico di Milano (IT), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
1.86
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Unmaking-with AI: Tactics for Decentering through Design — Iohanna Nicenboim, Anuradha Reddy, et al. · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS