Augmentation Samplers for Multinomial Probit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

The multinomial probit (MNP) (Imai and van Dyk, 2005) framework is based on a multivariate Gaussian latent structure, allowing for natural extensions to multilevel modeling. Unlike multinomial logistic models, MNP does not assume independent alternatives. Kindo et al. (2016) proposed multinomial probit BART (MPBART) to accommodate Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) formulation in MNP. The posterior sampling algorithms for MNP and MPBART are collapsed Gibbs samplers. Because the collapsing augmentation strategy yields a geometric rate of convergence no greater than that of a standard Gibbs sampling step, it is recommended whenever computationally feasible (Liu, 1994a; Imai and van Dyk, 2005). While this strategy necessitates simple sampling steps and a reasonably fast converging Markov chain, the complexity of the stochastic search for posterior trees may undermine its benefit. We address this problem by sampling posterior trees conditional on the constrained parameter space and compare our proposals to that of Kindo et al. (2016), who sample posterior trees based on an augmented parameter space. We also compare to the approach by Sparapani et al. (2021) that specified the multinomial model in terms of conditional probabilities. In terms of MCMC convergence and posterior predictive accuracy, our proposals are comparable to the conditional probability approach and outperform the augmented tree sampling approach. We also show that the theoretical mixing rates of our proposals are guaranteed to be no greater than the augmented tree sampling approach. Appendices and codes for simulations and demonstrations are available online.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2024.2388605
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmentation Samplers for Multinomial Probit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

Rami Kantor, Michael J. Daniels, Joseph W. Hogan, Ann Mwangi et al.
1 citations
Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
0.71
article

Augmentation Samplers for Multinomial Probit Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

Rami Kantor, Michael J. Daniels, Joseph W. Hogan, Ann Mwangi, Yizhen Xu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The multinomial probit (MNP) (Imai and van Dyk, 2005) framework is based on a multivariate Gaussian latent structure, allowing for natural extensions to multilevel modeling. Unlike multinomial logistic models, MNP does not assume independent alternatives. Kindo et al. (2016) proposed multinomial probit BART (MPBART) to accommodate Bayesian additive regression trees (BART) formulation in MNP. The posterior sampling algorithms for MNP and MPBART are collapsed Gibbs samplers. Because the collapsing augmentation strategy yields a geometric rate of convergence no greater than that of a standard Gibbs sampling step, it is recommended whenever computationally feasible (Liu, 1994a; Imai and van Dyk, 2005). While this strategy necessitates simple sampling steps and a reasonably fast converging Markov chain, the complexity of the stochastic search for posterior trees may undermine its benefit. We address this problem by sampling posterior trees conditional on the constrained parameter space and compare our proposals to that of Kindo et al. (2016), who sample posterior trees based on an augmented parameter space. We also compare to the approach by Sparapani et al. (2021) that specified the multinomial model in terms of conditional probabilities. In terms of MCMC convergence and posterior predictive accuracy, our proposals are comparable to the conditional probability approach and outperform the augmented tree sampling approach. We also show that the theoretical mixing rates of our proposals are guaranteed to be no greater than the augmented tree sampling approach. Appendices and codes for simulations and demonstrations are available online.

Journal of Computational and Graphical StatisticsVol. 34(2)
Moi University (KE), John Brown University (US), University of Utah (US), Brown University (US), University of Florida (US)
National Institutes of Health
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.