Database size positively correlates with the loss of species-level taxonomic resolution for the 16S rRNA and other prokaryotic marker genes

For decades, the 16S rRNA gene has been used to taxonomically classify prokaryotic species and to taxonomically profile microbial communities. However, the 16S rRNA gene has been criticized for being too conserved to differentiate between distinct species. We argue that the inability to differentiate between species is not a unique feature of the 16S rRNA gene. Rather, we observe the gradual loss of species-level resolution for other nearly-universal prokaryotic marker genes as the number of gene sequences increases in reference databases. This trend was strongly correlated with how represented a taxonomic group was in the database and indicates that, at the gene-level, the boundaries between many species might be fuzzy. Through our study, we argue that any approach that relies on a single marker to distinguish bacterial taxa is fraught even if some markers appear to be discriminative in current databases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS Computational Biology
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012343
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.87

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Database size positively correlates with the loss of species-level taxonomic resolution for the 16S rRNA and other prokaryotic marker genes

Seth Commichaux, Tu Luan, Mihai Pop, Harihara Subrahmaniam Muralidharan
8 citations
PLoS Computational Biology
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
1.87
article

Database size positively correlates with the loss of species-level taxonomic resolution for the 16S rRNA and other prokaryotic marker genes

Seth Commichaux, Tu Luan, Mihai Pop, Harihara Subrahmaniam Muralidharan
article en
8 citations

Abstract

For decades, the 16S rRNA gene has been used to taxonomically classify prokaryotic species and to taxonomically profile microbial communities. However, the 16S rRNA gene has been criticized for being too conserved to differentiate between distinct species. We argue that the inability to differentiate between species is not a unique feature of the 16S rRNA gene. Rather, we observe the gradual loss of species-level resolution for other nearly-universal prokaryotic marker genes as the number of gene sequences increases in reference databases. This trend was strongly correlated with how represented a taxonomic group was in the database and indicates that, at the gene-level, the boundaries between many species might be fuzzy. Through our study, we argue that any approach that relies on a single marker to distinguish bacterial taxa is fraught even if some markers appear to be discriminative in current databases.

PLoS Computational BiologyVol. 20(8)
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (US), University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Health
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
1.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Database size positively correlates with the loss of species-level taxonomic resolution for the 16S rRNA and other prokaryotic marker genes — Seth Commichaux, Tu Luan, et al. · PLoS Computational Biology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS