Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Bioethics: Recommendations from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors Presidential Task Force

Recent calls to address racism in bioethics reflect a sense of urgency to mitigate the lethal effects of a lack of action. While the field was catalyzed largely in response to pivotal events deeply rooted in racism and other structures of oppression embedded in research and health care, it has failed to center racial justice in its scholarship, pedagogy, advocacy, and practice, and neglected to integrate anti-racism as a central consideration. Academic bioethics programs play a key role in determining the field's norms and practices, including methodologies, funding priorities, and professional networks that bear on equity, inclusion, and epistemic justice. This article describes recommendations from the Racial Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (REDI) Task Force commissioned by the Association of Bioethics Program Directors to prioritize and strengthen anti-racist practices in bioethics programmatic endeavors and to evaluate and develop specific goals to advance REDI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The American Journal of Bioethics
Published
2024-08-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2024.2371116
Citations
22
Primary Topic
Diversity and Career in Medicine
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
20.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Bioethics: Recommendations from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors Presidential Task Force

Faith E. Fletcher, Christine Mitchell, Clarence H. Braddock, Alexis Walker et al.
22 citations
The American Journal of Bioethics
Diversity and Career in Medicine
20.45
article

Racial Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in Bioethics: Recommendations from the Association of Bioethics Program Directors Presidential Task Force

Faith E. Fletcher, Christine Mitchell, Clarence H. Braddock, Alexis Walker, Renee McLeod‐Sordjan, Jennifer E. James, Shawneequa Callier, Ubaka Ogbogu, Nneka Sederstrom, Sandra Soo‐Jin Lee, Nanibaa’ A. Garrison, Charlene Galarneau, Patrick T. Smith
article en
22 citations

Abstract

Recent calls to address racism in bioethics reflect a sense of urgency to mitigate the lethal effects of a lack of action. While the field was catalyzed largely in response to pivotal events deeply rooted in racism and other structures of oppression embedded in research and health care, it has failed to center racial justice in its scholarship, pedagogy, advocacy, and practice, and neglected to integrate anti-racism as a central consideration. Academic bioethics programs play a key role in determining the field's norms and practices, including methodologies, funding priorities, and professional networks that bear on equity, inclusion, and epistemic justice. This article describes recommendations from the Racial Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (REDI) Task Force commissioned by the Association of Bioethics Program Directors to prioritize and strengthen anti-racist practices in bioethics programmatic endeavors and to evaluate and develop specific goals to advance REDI.

The American Journal of BioethicsVol. 24(10)
Harvard University (US), Hofstra University (US), University of Alberta (CA), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Duke University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Baylor College of Medicine (US), George Washington University (US), Harvard University Press (US), National Human Genome Research Institute (US), Institute on Aging (US), Hennepin Healthcare Research Institute (US), Columbia University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Diversity and Career in Medicine
20.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.